1vol8
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2019
- Messages
- 7,776
- Likes
- 7,675
Ok... some of you may understand what I’m about to say and others may not but I’m going to take a shot at it anyway.
Over the past year I can’t count how many posts I’ve read along the lines of “If JG is our best then the others must be horrible”. That couldn’t be farther from the truth when you think about it. Those if you that feel that way, please read this with an open mind. I’ve posted this in threads but haven’t created a thread dedicated to explaining what I’m about to say.
Every coach has his preferences. It’s human instinct. Doesn’t matter what side of the ball you coach. I’m an offensive minded coach but I prefer a 3-4 defense for example. Why? Because I understand it much more clearly. However, If I head coached a team and demanded the 3-4 be run without the personnel I’d probably fail. The same holds true for qbs. Below is the difference in qb mentalities.

As you can see there are 4 different types of qb mentalities. Each fit with a certain type of system.
Field generals are created over time in a system. ANY qb absent of fear CAN become a field general Regardless of playing style so I don’t agree that is a “style”. That’s something you “become”.
Gunslingers. We now have 3 of these on our roster in Maurer, Shrout and Bailey. These guys don’t fear ints and will throw into tight windows without hesitation. Because of this type of playing style and lack of fear, accuracy is a must and usually best suited in a spread type of offense.
Option read. I feel this is the category Salter will fall in. Bunch formations and a strong power running game seems to fit this style of play the best. Think old school Alabama or GT.
Game manager. I don’t think anyone would disagree that this is JG. This is where the argument comes from within the fan base. His stats say one thing but his accuracy isn’t par for the course beyond 10 yards. It’s not his fault. That’s how he plays the game and there’s a place for that kind of qb in the right system like the “West Coast” offense. It’s no coincidence that Pruitt takes to JGs style over the others because of where he came from. Was Pruitt not the D coordinator at Alabama when Hurts was qb1?
Defensive minded coaches tend to prefer ball security on offense. Why? Because they want to protect their defense from getting winded. A tired defense can make a defensive minded coach look incompetent in a heartbeat. Therefore the Best match for Pruitts style is JG (at his best).
Offensive minded coaches tend to prefer a defense that’s good but not great. Why? A great defense has the same effect on an offense as an ineffective ball security offense has on a defense. A 3 and out puts your offense back on the field without rest. Therefore, without quality depth at WR, you wear them out. So offensive minded coaches WANT a “bend but don’t break” defense.
What’s interesting to me is Pruitts recruiting at the position. He’s recruited Maurer and Bailey and neither are game managers. Both are gunslingers. So I’m curious what his thoughts are post JG. The types of qbs he’s going after suggest he may be planning to adapt in the future? Maybe it’s possible that he knows we have more “talented” qbs on the bench but he’s using the time he has with JG “managing” games while he builds quality depth. Which would mean the term “JG is our best chance to win” only means “At this present time”.
Over the past year I can’t count how many posts I’ve read along the lines of “If JG is our best then the others must be horrible”. That couldn’t be farther from the truth when you think about it. Those if you that feel that way, please read this with an open mind. I’ve posted this in threads but haven’t created a thread dedicated to explaining what I’m about to say.
Every coach has his preferences. It’s human instinct. Doesn’t matter what side of the ball you coach. I’m an offensive minded coach but I prefer a 3-4 defense for example. Why? Because I understand it much more clearly. However, If I head coached a team and demanded the 3-4 be run without the personnel I’d probably fail. The same holds true for qbs. Below is the difference in qb mentalities.

As you can see there are 4 different types of qb mentalities. Each fit with a certain type of system.
Field generals are created over time in a system. ANY qb absent of fear CAN become a field general Regardless of playing style so I don’t agree that is a “style”. That’s something you “become”.
Gunslingers. We now have 3 of these on our roster in Maurer, Shrout and Bailey. These guys don’t fear ints and will throw into tight windows without hesitation. Because of this type of playing style and lack of fear, accuracy is a must and usually best suited in a spread type of offense.
Option read. I feel this is the category Salter will fall in. Bunch formations and a strong power running game seems to fit this style of play the best. Think old school Alabama or GT.
Game manager. I don’t think anyone would disagree that this is JG. This is where the argument comes from within the fan base. His stats say one thing but his accuracy isn’t par for the course beyond 10 yards. It’s not his fault. That’s how he plays the game and there’s a place for that kind of qb in the right system like the “West Coast” offense. It’s no coincidence that Pruitt takes to JGs style over the others because of where he came from. Was Pruitt not the D coordinator at Alabama when Hurts was qb1?
Defensive minded coaches tend to prefer ball security on offense. Why? Because they want to protect their defense from getting winded. A tired defense can make a defensive minded coach look incompetent in a heartbeat. Therefore the Best match for Pruitts style is JG (at his best).
Offensive minded coaches tend to prefer a defense that’s good but not great. Why? A great defense has the same effect on an offense as an ineffective ball security offense has on a defense. A 3 and out puts your offense back on the field without rest. Therefore, without quality depth at WR, you wear them out. So offensive minded coaches WANT a “bend but don’t break” defense.
What’s interesting to me is Pruitts recruiting at the position. He’s recruited Maurer and Bailey and neither are game managers. Both are gunslingers. So I’m curious what his thoughts are post JG. The types of qbs he’s going after suggest he may be planning to adapt in the future? Maybe it’s possible that he knows we have more “talented” qbs on the bench but he’s using the time he has with JG “managing” games while he builds quality depth. Which would mean the term “JG is our best chance to win” only means “At this present time”.