Hangover III

#1
lawgator1

lawgator1

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
74,586
Likes
44,095
#1
Possibly the worst movie of all time.

Seriously, save your money, it will be on cable by next weekend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4
#4
SDV said:
Worse than 2?
Click to expand...


Unfortunately, yes.

H3 is just awful. I'm headed to Vegas in two weeks for to play the pokerz, and figured this would be a great thing to psych me up (not that I really need it, but you get my point).

They spend all of about 15 minutes of the movie in Vegas and it makes next to no sense. I mean, its hard to watch this movie. Everyone there wanted to like it, there was some strained and hopeful laughter at the beginning.

But this movie totally sucked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#5
#5
SDV said:
Worse than 2?
Click to expand...

I don't get why people thought 2 was so bad.
I hope the ones who complained about the plot being the same make this movie lots of money, because you get what you asked for and it is terrible.

The first two were hilarious because they were the same in my opinion. You know Alan is some how gonna drug them, you know Stew is gonna have something happen to him and hook up with a prostitute. But finding out how all that happens is what made them great

In part III you get none of that. Absolute waste of time and money andthe worst movie I've seen in a long time.
Should have started with the end and it would have been way better imo!
 
#8
#8
ProfessorD said:
it was few and far between. I kept waiting for something crazy and it just never came.
Click to expand...

That's disappointing but thanks for the heads up because it saved me money. I'll probably rent it when it comes out but won't waste the money on seeing it at the theaters.
 
#9
#9
I thought the first one sucked outside of a couple of scenes.
 
#10
#10
lawgator1 said:
Possibly the worst movie of all time.

Seriously, save your money, it will be on cable by next weekend.
Click to expand...

The scene where the giraffe hits the overpass is a mile from my house.

In case anybody wanted to know.

Reviews for the movie are that it is awful.
 
#12
#12
I think they had a pro Bush comment in the movie which is why LG hated it. I'll wait for the reviews.

I keed.
 
#13
#13
It had some funny parts but it didn't really feel like a comedy movie. It was as good as part 2 and nowhere near part 1
 
#14
#14
I actually thought the first one was incredibly overrated. It was funny but not THAT funny.

The second one was boring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#15
#15
I just saw Part 3. While it definitely had its moments, it was definitely the worst of the three films. It also seemed as if some stuff was forced and the actors were just doing it for the money. Plus too much Chow.
 
#16
#16
I'm still wondering where the funny parts are in the first two. They were the most over hyped movies I've ever seen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#17
#17
rkw38 said:
I'm still wondering where the funny parts are in the first two. They were the most over hyped movies I've ever seen.
Click to expand...

The first one had some funny parts; I laughed at the "IN THE FACE!!" part, but yeah it's a very overrated movie.
 
#21
#21
UTVolInSpain said:
I just saw Part 3. While it definitely had its moments, it was definitely the worst of the three films. It also seemed as if some stuff was forced and the actors were just doing it for the money. Plus too much Chow.
Click to expand...

Definitely agree on the chow part. I would have been ok with him only being in the first one.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top