85SugarVol
I prefer the tumult of Liberty
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 35,694
- Likes
- 71,750
37% lax laws, 63% Chicago.
You can't blame other states. Chicago, and Illinois, have the strictest laws out there, if laws actually worked, there's zero chance that criminals in Chicago could get guns from other states, because it's against the law. Unless, you're admitting that laws don't work on criminals, and you just want legal gun owners to pay for what Democrats are doing in Chicago?37% lax laws, 63% Chicago.
Would you mind posting a picture of it? If you don't want to I understand, but I'll be honest I am not really sure what that is. Before the boat fire and sinking I had your basic AR15 with no additional bells and whistles and for killing paper it was fine so I haven't done much research into what could be.I have an AR SBR (registered) in 300BO, suppressed. About as pleasant a gun to shoot as you can have.
In a nutshell, you want a bigger federal government. Most of us on here want a smaller federal government. We will never agree. Hopefully you lose because large centralized governments never work.I love the Chicago example because Chicago is a great example of why the laws need to be federalized.
Chicago's gun problems are largely the result of the lax laws of surrounding states.
I love the Chicago example because Chicago is a great example of why the laws need to be federalized.
Chicago's gun problems are largely the result of the lax laws of surrounding states.
Well, that's great in it's simplicity; but it kind of ignores the fact that a significant portion of Chicago's problem is compounded by the ease in which people from outside of Chicago can come to the city and illegally sell guns,Chicago needs to solve its own problems. The rest of the country shouldn't have to conform to help chicago get itself right.
Your approach is even more simple minded, and lazy. Just make everything a Federal issue, problem solved. Why even have States? Am I right? These imaginary lines need to go. Let’s centralize all the power in one place and govern from there. Both reasonable and rational.Well, that's great in it's simplicity; but it kind of ignores the fact that a significant portion of Chicago's problem is compounded by the ease in which people from outside of Chicago can come to the city and illegally sell guns,
Sooooo their local laws don't cover those sales? I'm really not following you as to how federalizing your gun grab will help Shitcago?Well, that's great in it's simplicity; but it kind of ignores the fact that a significant portion of Chicago's problem is compounded by the ease in which people from outside of Chicago can come to the city and illegally sell guns,
Your problem then, isn’t with the inanimate object, it’s with people.Well, that's great in it's simplicity; but it kind of ignores the fact that a significant portion of Chicago's problem is compounded by the ease in which people from outside of Chicago can come to the city and illegally sell guns,
