Gun control debate (merged)

Among the common symptoms would be making statements like:
"When they pry them from my cold dead hands."
"What do you not understand about the words 'shall not be infringed'".
"Then amend the constitution."
"They wont stop until they take away all guns."
"We're all that stands between the government and......"

If you've made one or more of those comment, you might just be a gun nut.
So by your definition, technically someone could be a "gun nut" and not even own a gun. Correct?
 
Another "responsible gun owner." Oh, my:

Manhunt underway for gunman who killed 1 and wounded 4 in Atlanta medical facility
 
Among the common symptoms would be making statements like:
"When they pry them from my cold dead hands."
"What do you not understand about the words 'shall not be infringed'".
"Then amend the constitution."
"They wont stop until they take away all guns."
"We're all that stands between the government and......"

If you've made one or more of those comment, you might just be a gun nut.

Or you might be somebody that prefers freedom over the alternative.
 
Another "responsible gun owner." Oh, my:

Manhunt underway for gunman who killed 1 and wounded 4 in Atlanta medical facility
Something strange with this one. Took his mom to a dr's appointment and decided to start shooting. Except for the picture of the guy I dont know anything else about him.
 
You view an armed citizenry as a negative. I guess that figures.
Of course I never said that. Once again, I think it is the 3,257th time you guys claim I say or think something that I never said.

Here's what some of you obviously do not get: We can have the right to keep and bear arms and we can be an armed citizenry without being a gun crazed nation with a complete lack of rational and reasonable regulations and restrictions.

How many guns would need to be in the hands of the citizenry for you to consider it to be armed? I'm assuming you wont answer, unless I say "I'm assuming you wont answer".
 
He's not hiding in naivety. He wants to disarm the population. He's already said he is in favor of banning semi auto weapons, which is around 80% of those sold.
Well he probably thinks semi auto equals a laws rocket. Liberal nut
 
Of course I never said that. Once again, I think it is the 3,257th time you guys claim I say or think something that I never said.

Here's what some of you obviously do not get: We can have the right to keep and bear arms and we can be an armed citizenry without being a gun crazed nation with a complete lack of rational and reasonable regulations and restrictions.

How many guns would need to be in the hands of the citizenry for you to consider it to be armed? I'm assuming you wont answer, unless I say "I'm assuming you wont answer".
I could ask you a similar question - How many guns do we need to reduce down to before it no longer feels like a “3rd world country” to you?

But I already know your answer.

You’d try and get cute with your vagueness, then smirk while posting something along the lines of “less than we have today”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol
Of course I never said that. Once again, I think it is the 3,257th time you guys claim I say or think something that I never said.

Here's what some of you obviously do not get: We can have the right to keep and bear arms and we can be an armed citizenry without being a gun crazed nation with a complete lack of rational and reasonable regulations and restrictions.

How many guns would need to be in the hands of the citizenry for you to consider it to be armed? I'm assuming you wont answer, unless I say "I'm assuming you wont answer".

Gun nut 👆🏽
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
No. But you should understand why there’s a 2nd Amendment.

The idiotic thinkers ignore what Mao, Pol Pot, Stalin, Hitler, Castro, and Chávez pulled off. You know. Fellers that went after the “gun nuts”.
I understand fully why there is a 2nd Amendment. That's why I've always supported a person's right to keep and bear arms.
 
Another "responsible gun owner." Oh, my:

Manhunt underway for gunman who killed 1 and wounded 4 in Atlanta medical facility
Or perhaps it was another mentally ill person that decided he wanted to kill somebody. If you figure out a way to get the gun out of his possession he still wants to kill somebody because he's mentally ill.
 
I could ask you a similar question - How many guns do we need to reduce down to before it no longer feels like a “3rd world country” to you?

But I already know your answer.

You’d try and get cute with your vagueness, then smirk while posting something along the lines of “less than we have today”.
I'm positive you do not know my answer. Give it a shot. I'll give you an honest response.
 
I wanted to hear what you think my answer is first. You said you already knew it. I'll tell you my actual answer after you tell me what you thing it is. It will be fun.
I did in my post you replied to. It’s in quotes at the end.
 

VN Store



Back
Top