Gun control debate (merged)

[C-south]

Exactly what I proved by the posted examples.
You're welcome.

Lol. Because rules, laws, restrictions, bans, and infringements negate the supply of the tools that criminals demand. gtfo.

 

[MG1968]

Well then the rest certainly wasn't worth reading.
I have no desire whatsoever to interfere with a person's right to keep and bear arms.

Unless of course gun nuts are insane enough to go down the anything and everything or nothing path.
(90% will pick nothing if those are the only two options) I wish more gun nuts could comprehend this.

Are gun nuts the ones committing the mass casualty events?

 

[C-south]

Up to 5! But still seems low.
Where all the gun nuts at????????

Look in the mirror.

 

[Vol8188]

And that is how we got the Dept. of Education.

One of the most useless departments

 

[luthervol]

Another failing government agency.

So now you know the order.
States fail which brings in the Fed, and then the Fed fails (or so the people from the failing states think)

You can back it up even more if you wish.
People fail which brings us local.
Localities fail which brings us states,
States fail which brings us federal.
Countries fail which brings us global.
And round and round we go.

 

[luthervol]

Are gun nuts the ones committing the mass casualty events?

At least partially, and certainly indirectly.

 

[C-south]

So now you know the order.
States fail which brings in the Fed, and then the Fed fails (or so the people from the failing states think)

You can back it up even more if you wish.
People fail which brings us local.
Localities fail which brings us states,
States fail which brings us federal.
Countries fail which brings us global.
And round and round we go.

Thanks for you and the morons you support for fast tracking us.

 

[luthervol]

One of the most useless departments

It helped straighten a few states out just a little.
If only we wouldn't have had so many states that sucked and refused to do what was right.

 

[Vol8188]

It helped straighten a few states out just a little.
If only we wouldn't have had so many states that sucked and refused to do what was right.

What exactly are you referring to it “straightening” states out on?

 

[loggervol]

It helped straighten a few states out just a little.
If only we wouldn't have had so many states that sucked and refused to do what was right.

You should put a disclaimer in your posts. It’s according to your and certain opinions, not everyone’s opinion.

 

[luthervol]

You should put a disclaimer in your posts. It’s according to your and certain opinions, not everyone’s opinion.

I assume that is a disclaimer that is attached to everyone's posts.....always.

 

[MG1968]

At least partially, and certainly indirectly.

Got any proof? Or are you just pulling that assertion out of your posterior?

 

[luthervol]

What exactly are you referring to it “straightening” states out on?

Just saw this.......The original Department of Education was created in 1867 to collect information on schools and teaching that would help the States establish effective school systems.

 

[Vol8188]

At least partially, and certainly indirectly.

You just claimed they were disproportionately committing gun crimes.

 

[luthervol]

Got any proof? Or are you just pulling that assertion out of your posterior?

The 2017 Las Vegas shooting was certainly done by a gun nut,

 

[MG1968]

The 2017 Las Vegas shooting was certainly done by a gun nut,

That’s one.

 

[luthervol]

That’s one.

Which is proof of what I said in my post, which is what you asked for.

 

[Vol8188]

Just saw this.......The original Department of Education was created in 1867 to collect information on schools and teaching that would help the States establish effective school systems.

If you’d like to return it to that purpose only, scope, and size, I’d be on board

 

[MG1968]

Which is proof of what I said in my post, which is what you asked for.

You used a plural (gun nuts), and when asked for proof, you provided a single, weak, anecdote.

 

[loggervol]

I assume that is a disclaimer that is attached to everyone's posts.....always.

Ok, so whose opinion is right? We have guidelines to go by already, right? The Constitution that was written not only worked in the past, it still works today.

 

[85SugarVol]

At least partially, and certainly indirectly.

You sound like @lawgator1 saying Trump should stand trial for killing cops at the Capitol riot.

 

[Vol8188]

You sound like @lawgator1 saying Trump should stand trial for killing cops at the Capitol riot.

Lmao he said that? About the cops that didn’t die at the Capitol riot? That’s hilarious

 

[luthervol]

Ok, so whose opinion is right? We have guidelines to go by already, right? The Constitution that was written not only worked in the past, it still works today.

Sure. And their have been different opinions on how to interpret the constitution since day one.
It's kind of like the bible. A bunch of people love it and claim it as their guide, but all interpret it differently.

 

[Vol8188]

Sure. And their have been different opinions on how to interpret the constitution since day one.
It's kind of like the bible. A bunch of people love it and claim it as their guide, but all interpret it differently.

There’s not valid alternative interpretations to the 2nd amendment that anyone familiar with the English language can honestly hold.

 

[luthervol]

You sound like @lawgator1 saying Trump should stand trial for killing cops at the Capitol riot.

Trump's role in the Jan. 6th national shame shows him to be exactly what I always maintained; a horrendously despicable human.
But I'm not sure he can be accused of anything legally beyond inciting a riot.
Now what he attempted to do in GA, that's another story all together.