Gun control debate (merged)

Here's a little good news:

Yeah it's Brazil, but still shows that good guys with guns are a good thing. Skip to about 26 seconds for the action.


This just shows how stupid this guy was. If I'm going to rob a store, I'm not walking into a place with 6 other people already there. Thankfully, though, he dead.
 
Rumors are that the mash potato brain president has pressured Lake city to stop selling 223/556 to the general public. Lake City is responsible for 30% of the supply. We've already lost a significant source in Russia. It's obvious how the commie bastards are thinking. If they can't get them legally, they'll restrict them somehow through the ammo.
 
Just as the founders intended it. That, along with the sitting Vice President having the unilateral power to choose the next president.

 
Because obviously gun owners can't take care of pets. I need to give up my rescue GSD that only had a week to live when I got her ten years ago and toss out the cat which would have been easy prey for the great horned owl I have living nearby that's already eating full sized possums...

Furthermore, I want to know which judge would allow a lawsuit for "fraud" to go forward based on if they were or were not a member of the NRA.

PETA rebuts California woman who won't allow pro-gun supporters to adopt pets

Animal rights nonprofit People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) pushed back against a California animal shelter's decision to turn away potential pet adoptees based on their opinions about gun control.

"We do not support those who believe that the 2nd amendment gives them the right to buy assault weapons," wrote the Shelter Hope Pet Shop in Thousand Oaks, California, according to their website. "If your beliefs are not in line with ours, we will not adopt a pet to you."

"If you hesitate, because your core belief is that you believe teachers need to carry firearms, then you will not get approved to adopt from us," the shelter continued. "If you foster for us and believe in guns, please bring our dogs and/or cats back, or we will arrange to have them picked up." People who lie about being members of the National Rifle Association (NRA) will be potentially be sued for fraud, the shelter further warned.
 
Because obviously gun owners can't take care of pets. I need to give up my rescue GSD that only had a week to live when I got her ten years ago and toss out the cat which would have been easy prey for the great horned owl I have living nearby that's already eating full sized possums...

Furthermore, I want to know which judge would allow a lawsuit for "fraud" to go forward based on if they were or were not a member of the NRA.

PETA rebuts California woman who won't allow pro-gun supporters to adopt pets
This one disapproves of this message. Rescued 11 years ago next month. It's been a tough life...
20220617_080759.jpg
 
Because obviously gun owners can't take care of pets. I need to give up my rescue GSD that only had a week to live when I got her ten years ago and toss out the cat which would have been easy prey for the great horned owl I have living nearby that's already eating full sized possums...

Furthermore, I want to know which judge would allow a lawsuit for "fraud" to go forward based on if they were or were not a member of the NRA.

PETA rebuts California woman who won't allow pro-gun supporters to adopt pets

Jury finds in favor of the plaintiff. Damages awarded: $0. Now go pay your attorney their fees.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Just the well-regulated militia that the founders intended. 'Murica!


How much you want to bet the perpetrators weren't allowed to own guns? But wait, they broke that law. How could cold blooded killer dbags ignore those laws? So confusing .

When liberals want to accept that the VAST majority of mass shooting are gang violence maybe people will want to talk. Instead you want to pretend it's white kids shooting up high schools. It's shameful
 
One of the points he was attempting to make (beefing up security everywhere except schools, basically) reminded me of something I saw the other day which is pertinent:
View attachment 465339
No it can be solved by addressing gang violence. Why does the left only give a shot when a school or church is shot up? The vast majority is criminals killing criminals.
 
No it can be solved by addressing gang violence. Why does the left only give a shot when a school or church is shot up? The vast majority is criminals killing criminals.
Why does the right only care about gang violence when they feel gun rights are threatened? It’s called scapegoating. Come with a real solution if you want to shift the attention rather than just pointing at another problem. Gang violence is bad, school shootings are bad, the two aren’t mutually exclusive.
 
Why does the right only care about gang violence when they feel gun rights are threatened? It’s called scapegoating. Come with a real solution if you want to shift the attention rather than just pointing at another problem. Gang violence is bad, school shootings are bad, the two aren’t mutually exclusive.
One is waaaaaaaaay worse then the other in terms of number of deaths and frequency. This isn't hard. And I see people on the right talking about gang violence all the time . Sometimes like morons .
 
Sometimes I think the left forgets that there are you know laws against killing people.

Yet criminals break those laws but the left continue to think more laws will be the answer.
Plus they have a habit of ignoring the laws they don’t like …..which in several cases has lead to more shootings.

Yes, it’s that stupid
 
Advertisement





Back
Top