Gun control debate (merged)

[C-south]

They are using the gun precisely as it was designed to be used........firing projectiles at targets with deadly force.

Not if you aim for their leg.

 

[825VOL]

You all need to leave Luther alone. He is too busy thinking about the STRONGLY WORDED email he will send the day before he retires in which he will push for his school to have the same type of liability that he champions for gun manufacturers. That has to be stressful on him and probably consumes all his time and mental acuities.

 

[0nelilreb]

That was the object of choice to misuse for something completely other than its intended purpose.

None of those things were made to kill innocent people either . You did get the misuse of the object correct .

 

[luthervol]

Since when are knives not meant to kill?

You said kitchen knives.

Say something different if you want to discuss something different.

 

[C-south]

That was the object of choice to misuse for something completely other than its intended purpose.

You can’t determine what a person’s intent is with anything. You’re completely ignorant on this subject ,much like everything else, and just keep digging yourself a deeper hole.

 

[C-south]

You said kitchen knives.

Say something different if you want to discuss something different.

What about a gun for target shooting?

 

[luthervol]

You all need to leave Luther alone. He is too busy thinking about the STRONGLY WORDED email he will send the day before he retires in which he will push for his school to have the same type of liability that he champions for gun manufacturers. That has to be stressful on him and probably consumes all his time and mental acuities.

I'm good. Been doing it for decades. I can multi-task.
You're welcome.

 

[0nelilreb]

Pin him down with his own words , don’t let him tap dance away from to kill “ innocent people “ lol

 

[Rickyvol77]

For producing and marketing a product which will be used as intended to kill innocent people.

 

[luthervol]

You can’t determine what a person’s intent is with anything. You’re completely ignorant on this subject ,much like everything else, and just keep digging yourself a deeper hole.

I've never been anti gun.
Trap and skeet shooting was one of my favorite classes at TTU.
My son went hunting (for the first time) a couple of weekends ago.
I'm all for people having the right to own guns for protection, hunting, and sport in general.

 

[Rickyvol77]

Lol Jesus.

He may be the dumbest lib on this board. Which doesn’t surprise me sadly

 

[C-south]

I've never been anti gun.
Trap and skeet shooting was one of my favorite classes at TTU.
My son went hunting (for the first time) a couple of weekends ago.
I'm all for people having the right to own guns for protection, hunting, and sport in general.

But they’re all for “killing innocent people”. Your exact words.

 

[luthervol]

Pin him down with his own words , don’t let him tap dance away from to kill “ innocent people “ lol

Whose tap dancing? I'll repeat it. Maybe you will understand this time.
All to often people use guns as intended to kill innocent people.

 

[luthervol]

But they’re all for “killing innocent people”. Your exact words.

Those are 3 of my exact words - try putting them in context. The lack of comprehension skills many of you exhibit is astounding.

 

[Rickyvol77]

They are using the gun precisely as it was designed to be used........firing projectiles at targets with deadly force.

Illegally.

 

[luthervol]

Illegally.

Thank god for rational and reasonable laws.

 

[C-south]

Those are 3 of my exact words - try putting them in context. The lack of comprehension skills many of you exhibit is astounding.

How can someone guess what your alleged context was? You said what you said and there’s no other way to spin it.

 

[Rickyvol77]

Thank god for rational and reasonable laws.

Yes thank god your illogical anti gun nut way of thinking will never exist

 

[0nelilreb]

Whose tap dancing? I'll repeat it. Maybe you will understand this time.
All to often people use guns as intended to kill innocent people.

The people that market the firearms never , have never , will never produce or market one specifically for criminals use in their criminal activities. They are produced and marketed for legal firearm use only . What you do with that product is The SOLE RESPONSIBILITY of the ones holding it . It’s the same as saying a company that produces Tanks should be held responsible and liable if some idiot sneaks on a base , steals it and starts running over cars .

 

[luthervol]

How can someone guess what your alleged context was? You said what you said and there’s no other way to spin it.

I'm not trying to spin it.
I'm trying to get you to read with understanding. I've said it twice
Maybe the third time is the charm:

All to often people use guns as intended to kill innocent people.

 

[Rickyvol77]

I'm not trying to spin it.
I'm trying to get you to read with understanding. I've said it twice
Maybe the third time is the charm:

All to often people use guns as intended to kill innocent people.

All too often people use cars, knives, gasoline, fire, fertilizer, rat poison, bricks, bats, etc etc to kill innocent people

 

[0nelilreb]

I'm not trying to spin it.
I'm trying to get you to read with understanding. I've said it twice
Maybe the third time is the charm:

All to often people use guns as intended to kill innocent people.

Who is intending on killing innocent people , let’s skin the cat a different way .

 

[InVOLuntary]

Of course not. Is there a point?

Well if the manufacturer is not liable for the non-innocent gun how can they be liable for the innocent one?

 

[luthervol]

The people that market the firearms never , have never , will never produce or market one specifically for criminals use in their criminal activities. They are produced and marketed for legal firearm use only . What you do with that product is The SOLE RESPONSIBILITY of the ones holding it . It’s the same as saying a company that produces Tanks should be held responsible and liable if some idiot sneaks on a base , steals it and starts running over cars .

They produce and market firearms with the intended purpose of firing projectiles at targets with deadly force.
I think the owner of the tank would and should be liable in your analogy.

Now if there were 300 million tanks easily available in our country, some responsibility would naturally shift to the producer.

 

[luthervol]

Who is intending on killing innocent people , let’s skin the cat a different way .

The people who are using a gun as intended to do so.