Gun control debate (merged)

[InVOLuntary]

I believe the result of using it as intended is all to often the killing of innocent people.

So when a person stabs another with a kitchen knife, the knife was designed and intended to kill innocent people?

What if someone breaks into my home and threatens to kill me or my family was the gun I shot him with intended to kill innocent people? Was the guy that broke in innocent?

 

[luthervol]

“Marketed and produced , which will be USED AS INTENDED , to kill innocent people .”

You added the comma. I thought 2a people knew all about the importance of a comma.

 

[0nelilreb]

Luther you are mixing peoples ( criminals ) intentions to MISUSE a firearm and your highly subjected opinion with the actual facts and trying to pass them off as some liability for the firearms mfg.

 

[0nelilreb]

You added the comma. I thought 2a people knew all about the importance of a comma.

My comma doesn’t keep your greedy little hands off my firearms like “THE COMMA” does . Huge difference .

 

[luthervol]

So when a person stabs another with a kitchen knife, the knife was designed and intended to kill innocent people?

What if someone breaks into my home and threatens to kill me or my family was the gun I shot him with intended to kill innocent people? Was the guy that broke in innocent?

No, I hope you shoot the guy 50 times, and then 20 more times in the crotch.

The intended purpose of a kitchen knife is not to stab living creatures; it's to spread peanut butter.

 

[C-south]

You added the comma. I thought 2a people knew all about the importance of a comma.

Nobody has to interpret the 2A or any other part of the constitution. The forefathers added tons of context and examples before and after it was written.

 

[C-south]

No, I hope you shoot the guy 50 times, and then 20 more times in the crotch.

The intended purpose of a kitchen knife is not to stab living creatures; it's to spread peanut butter.

So why are people killed with kitchen knives?

 

[luthervol]

Luther you are mixing peoples ( criminals ) intentions to MISUSE a firearm and your highly subjected opinion with the actual facts and trying to pass them off as some liability for the firearms mfg.

Guns are intended to fire projectiles at targets with deadly force and velocity.

 

[luthervol]

My comma doesn’t keep your greedy little hands off my firearms like “THE COMMA” does . Huge difference .

But it did change the meaning of my statement.

 

[InVOLuntary]

No, I hope you shoot the guy 50 times, and then 20 more times in the crotch.

The intended purpose of a kitchen knife is not to stab living creatures; it's to spread peanut butter.

So what differentiates a gun used designed to kill innocent people vs non innocent people? Is there labeling when you buy them?

 

[DancingOutlaw]

For producing and marketing a product which will be used as intended to kill innocent people.

Lol Jesus.

 

[DEFENDTHISHOUSE]

The only responsibility a gun manufacturer should have is if their product malfunctions. No one even remotely tied to Remington walked into that school. That kid murdered his own mother to gain access to her guns and this is the outcome? Unreal.

 

[0nelilreb]

Guns are intended to fire projectiles at targets with deadly force and velocity.

Now you are leaving out key words from your original post like .. “INNOCENT PEOPLE “

 

[C-south]

Guns are intended to fire projectiles at targets with deadly force and velocity.

Is paper a living thing? How about steel plates?

 

[luthervol]

So why are people killed with kitchen knives?

Mainly because the person didn't have easy access to a gun so they had to resort to misusing an object which was not built to kill.

 

[0nelilreb]

But it did change the meaning of my statement.

Your words , that you chose , is what was being questioned . Not my comma .

 

[InVOLuntary]

Mainly because the person didn't have easy access to a gun so they had to resort to misusing an object which was not built to kill.

Some could argue that those criminals are misusing the gun. Maybe it's the person behind the object and not the object.

 

[luthervol]

Now you are leaving out key words from your original post like .. “INNOCENT PEOPLE “

No I'm not. I never said the intended purpose was to kill innocent people.
I just said the intended purpose was to fire projectiles at targets with deadly force and velocity.
All to often, people use that intended purpose to kill innocent people.

 

[joevol33]

Some could argue that those criminals are misusing the gun. Maybe it's the person behind the object and not the object.

He'll never understand, or accept that, none of them will.

 

[luthervol]

So what differentiates a gun used designed to kill innocent people vs non innocent people? Is there labeling when you buy them?

Of course not. Is there a point?

 

[0nelilreb]

Mainly because the person didn't have easy access to a gun so they had to resort to misusing an object which was not built to kill.

Didn’t have easy access to a gun ? What about a hammer , a car , a bulldozer , a lion , a trained attack possum ? None of these things were available to the criminal so he chose a knife ?

 

[C-south]

Mainly because the person didn't have easy access to a gun so they had to resort to misusing an object which was not built to kill.

Since when are knives not meant to kill?

 

[0nelilreb]

For producing and marketing a product which will be used as intended to kill innocent people.

I guess I need new glasses .

 

[luthervol]

Some could argue that those criminals are misusing the gun. Maybe it's the person behind the object and not the object.

They are using the gun precisely as it was designed to be used........firing projectiles at targets with deadly force.

 

[luthervol]

Didn’t have easy access to a gun ? What about a hammer , a car , a bulldozer , a lion , a trained attack possum ? None of these things were available to the criminal so he chose a knife ?

That was the object of choice to misuse for something completely other than its intended purpose.