Gun control debate (merged)

#18,479
#18,479
MG1968 said:
Hog works in the trucking industry and accepts that some regulations are necessary while most are just asinine.
Click to expand...
That sounds to reasonable to be a hog position.
But I think we most all agree that regulations are necessary but some are asinine. (not sure about hog)
 
#18,482
#18,482
luthervol said:
lol.......I saw that.
Let the pandering begin.
Kemp is going to go radical right in an attempt to keep some Trumpers; most of them are for the idiot Perdue.
That race is going to be hysterical to watch. I guarantee SNL gets at least one skit from it.
Click to expand...

While dubious of the meaningfulness of how you would define "radical right" for the sake of argument let's assume some right leaning pandering by Kemp. Hate to break it to you but Constitutional Carry (with varying degrees of absoluteness) is the law in nearly half the states already. Whatever else may come to pass permitless carry really doesn't meet the definition of "radical" at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland, Rickyvol77, NorthDallas40 and 1 other person
#18,483
#18,483
hndog609 said:
While dubious of the meaningfulness of how you would define "radical right" for the sake of argument let's assume some right leaning pandering by Kemp. Hate to break it to you but Constitutional Carry (with varying degrees of absoluteness) is the law in nearly half the states already. Whatever else may come to pass permitless carry really doesn't meet the definition of "radical" at this point.
Click to expand...
One man's radical is another man's reasonable. That's why society has to ultimately decide.
But I was focused more on Kemp's timing and intent......let the pandering begin.
 
#18,492
#18,492
luthervol said:
One man's radical is another man's reasonable. That's why society has to ultimately decide.
But I was focused more on Kemp's timing and intent......let the pandering begin.
Click to expand...

To the first part I put in the caveat about your..."tendencies"...regarding definitions.
To the second part I was just pointing out that, regardless of who or when they are advocating, permitless carry really can't be considered particularly "radical".
 
#18,493
#18,493
hndog609 said:
To the first part I put in the caveat about your..."tendencies"...regarding definitions.
To the second part I was just pointing out that, regardless of who or when they are advocating, permitless carry really can't be considered particularly "radical".
Click to expand...
It's considered radical by some.
Roe v Wade is considered radical by some even though it is perfectly constitutional, rational, and reasonable to most.
 
#18,499
#18,499
luthervol said:
It's considered radical by some.
Roe v Wade is considered radical by some even though it is perfectly constitutional, rational, and reasonable to most.
Click to expand...

LOL! Classic example of your previously cited tendencies with definitions. "Radical by some" would reduce the meaning of radical to nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top