Gun control debate (merged)

#15,930
#15,930
NorthDallas40 said:
Found an article which said their are going after 80% lower receivers too
Click to expand...

I hadn't heard that but it's not surprising. This is what happens when an unaccountable government department is giving the freedom to interpret and reinterpret things as they please.

Theres a metric **** ton of these pistol braces in circulation by now though, so good luck enforcing this ****.
 
#15,932
#15,932
Pepe_Silvia said:
It appears that theyre moving towards classifying many of them as stocks instead of braces, rendering any gun equipped with one as an SBR.
Click to expand...

I saw something a few weeks ago about it but so far it had only pertained to one AR pistol, the honey badger. They have flipped a few times on AR pistols and tried to dictate how you hold it when you fire. It’s stupid to try and dictate how someone holds a gun, any gun, to determine how you classify it. The last ruling said you could shoulder a pistol brace as long as it was “incidental, sporadic, or situational”. Lol.
 
#15,935
#15,935
C-south said:
I saw something a few weeks ago about it but so far it had only pertained to one AR pistol, the honey badger. They have flipped a few times on AR pistols and tried to dictate how you hold it when you fire. It’s stupid to try and dictate how someone holds a gun, any gun, to determine how you classify it. The last ruling said you could shoulder a pistol brace as long as it was “incidental, sporadic, or situational”. Lol.
Click to expand...

They released a letter today or yesterday saying that most of the pistol brace models on the market have not yet been evaluated by them and thus are in limbo. Couple that with the honey badger case and their goal seems pretty clear.
 
#15,941
#15,941
Pepe_Silvia said:
They released a letter today or yesterday saying that most of the pistol brace models on the market have not yet been evaluated by them and thus are in limbo. Couple that with the honey badger case and their goal seems pretty clear.
Click to expand...

Haven’t seen the new news yet. I’m sure they’ll be going after a lot of stuff with sleepy Joe but I can’t see them enforcing much of anything. I saw something where they may list them as an AOW which is a much lower tax than the SBR stamp. Mine has an sba3 on it which has been out for awhile now.
 
#15,942
#15,942
Pepe_Silvia said:
50 cpr is about as good as it gets these days. Kicking myself for not stacking it high and deep when it could be had for 25cpr.
Click to expand...

tenor.gif
 
#15,943
#15,943
C-south said:
Haven’t seen the new news yet. I’m sure they’ll be going after a lot of stuff with sleepy Joe but I can’t see them enforcing much of anything. I saw something where they may list them as an AOW which is a much lower tax than the SBR stamp. Mine has an sba3 on it which has been out for awhile now.
Click to expand...

Looks like they'll be more bold with biden in office. But these pistol braces are basically untraceable so enforcing any ban will be extremely difficult if not impossible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C-south and Orangeslice13
#15,944
#15,944
Pepe_Silvia said:
Looks like they'll be more bold with biden in office. But these pistol braces are basically untraceable so enforcing any ban will be extremely difficult if not impossible.
Click to expand...

Same could be said about this alleged $200 tax on standard cap mags.

However, don't issue a challenge like that to liberals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40 and Pepe_Silvia
#15,948
#15,948
Grand Vol said:
Same could be said about this alleged $200 tax on standard cap mags.

However, don't issue a challenge like that to liberals.
Click to expand...

This looks like a good place to say “thanks“.

Thanks in large part to you, I am in very good shape across the board, and can sit pat and watch what happens.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top