Gun control debate (merged)

Not so fast my friend!🤔



It’s ridiculous to do it in all Walmart stores . They have all the stats and information they need to make that decision based on the stores that are high risk instead of a blanket policy . It was the equivalent of say I’m going to put bars on all my windows and doors because a house was broken into in Detroit .
 
It’s ridiculous to do it in all Walmart stores . They have all the stats and information they need to make that decision based on the stores that are high risk instead of a blanket policy . It was the equivalent of say I’m going to put bars on all my windows and doors because a house was broken into in Detroit .

As if we haven't seen plenty of knee jerk reactions this year...
 
He won’t / can’t do sh!t without holding the Senate . Anything he does do illegally by EO .. ACB will get to help him understand how the constitution works . Lol

If he goes the route of EO, who's going to intervene? They'll find a way to say it's legal. My concern is with Kamala and Beth in his cabinet. They will fill his head with some absurd ideas.
 
If they come after the 2nd the first will be next. People say you can't take on the military with AR15s but that's not the point. The military would be a last case scenario for the communist democrats. They would look first to the police to enforce their ways. An armed insurrection could definitely hold its own against police.
 
Last edited:
If they come after the 2nd the first will be next. People say you can't take of the military with AR15s but that's not the point. The military would be a last case scenario for the communist democrats. They would look first to the police to enforce their ways. An armed insurrection could definitely hold its own against police.
I find it laughable to assume a significant number of military personnel would raise arms against their countrymen. They know that isn’t their business. Like you said first line would be LEO’s
 
I could see a military coup before our arm forces turned against the people.
I think it would fracture the military leadership in the short term and they would square off on each other and in the longer term the rank and file noncom and soldier would say WTF am I doing and just stop.
 
If he goes the route of EO, who's going to intervene? They'll find a way to say it's legal. My concern is with Kamala and Beth in his cabinet. They will fill his head with some absurd ideas.

Can’t wait till all those poor AAs get their gun tax bill.
 
I was reading up on the SBR and challenging that law. The last time the NFA was challenged the federal government argued that the 2A was meant to protect military weapons And weapons of war and that the NFA didn’t infringe on those.

It’s going to be real difficult now for the federal government to now argue that the 2A doesn’t protect weapons of war.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
On March 30, 1939, the Supreme Court heard the case. Attorneys for the United States argued four points:

  1. The NFA is intended as a revenue-collecting measure and so is within the authority of the Department of the Treasury.
  2. The defendants transported the shotgun from Oklahoma to Arkansas and so used it in interstate commerce.
  3. The Second Amendment protects only the ownership of military-type weapons appropriate for use in an organized militia.
  4. The "double barrel 12-gauge Stevensshotgun having a barrel less than 18 inches in length, bearing identification number 76230," was never used in any militia organization.
 
I was reading up on the SBR and challenging that law. The last time the NFA was challenged the federal government argued that the 2A was meant to protect military weapons And weapons of war and that the NFA didn’t infringe on those.

It’s going to be real difficult now for the federal government to now argue that the 2A doesn’t protect weapons of war.
When I built a pistol I saw the writing on the wall. I passed on the brace and paid the $200 and waited my year. I figured that the brace was going to become problematic.
 
I find it laughable to assume a significant number of military personnel would raise arms against their countrymen. They know that isn’t their business. Like you said first line would be LEO’s
Police aren’t doing that either outside of small groups in NY or Cali
 
When I built a pistol I saw the writing on the wall. I passed on the brace and paid the $200 and waited my year. I figured that the brace was going to become problematic.

I just bought a pistol recently with a brace. The sbr thing is ridiculous to begin with and the way they’ve flip flopped on the braces (ATF) discredits them even more.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top