Gun control debate (merged)

A bolt action .22 kills. Making it an effective "weapon of war"
I have a collection of Ruger Ranch rifles.
A 10/22, mini 14 and mini 30. They all look very similar and a novice could not tell you which was which. One shoots a 22lr. One shoots 556 (AR 15 round) and one shoots the 762:39. (AK 47 round). I use all of them to hunt. The weapons of war thing is stupid.
 
I have a collection of Ruger Ranch rifles.
A 10/22, mini 14 and mini 30. They all look very similar and a novice could not tell you which was which. One shoots a 22lr. One shoots 556 (AR 15 round) and one shoots the 762:39. (AK 47 round). I use all of them to hunt. The weapons of war thing is stupid.
What's the x39 like to shoot? I never have.

556 either didnt climb at all, or bucks like a shotgun almost, just in terms of climb, not recoil. Never had issue with a 762x51 (308) wanting to climb as much. May just be the platform used.
 
What's the x39 like to shoot? I never have.

556 either didnt climb at all, or bucks like a shotgun almost, just in terms of climb, not recoil. Never had issue with a 762x51 (308) wanting to climb as much. May just be the platform used.
None of the Rugers climb. Well the 14 tach does but the ranch rifles all tend to push straight back. Easy to keep on target.
 
I have a collection of Ruger Ranch rifles.
A 10/22, mini 14 and mini 30. They all look very similar and a novice could not tell you which was which. One shoots a 22lr. One shoots 556 (AR 15 round) and one shoots the 762:39. (AK 47 round). I use all of them to hunt. The weapons of war thing is stupid.
This was also a weapon of war! Liberals don't understand that American citizens have been using versions of military weapons since this country was founded!
prodotti_immagini_immagine2_369.jpg
 
And all weapon technological advancements ceased with its development and enshrinement in 2a
That's why the Democrats make sure our military doesnt spend any money on weapon development programs. Surely if it's good enough for the citizens it's good enough for the government.
 
These people are so close to understanding the value of an armed citizenry, but they can't quite make the final connection.

View attachment 283136
I saw this argument posited on CNN last night. The obvious difference is that the Michigan protest did not involve any lawlessness. Sure, it was an obnoxious show of force but everything those protesters did was within the law. Burning, looting, attacking police and other people, destroying public property, etc. are all crimes.
 
I saw this argument posited on CNN last night. The obvious difference is that the Michigan protest did not involve any lawlessness. Sure, it was an obnoxious show of force but everything those protesters did was within the law. Burning, looting, attacking police and other people, destroying public property, etc. are all crimes.

Also, the police are likely to show more restraint when faced with armed protestors.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top