37L1
Good Dog!
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2012
- Messages
- 11,808
- Likes
- 17,754
You can give away what is yours and nobody cares. You are not entitled to decide what I will and won’t give away.As with the 2A, if it takes reasonable restrictions of individuals' rights, especially in times of national crisis, to protect the general public, then I am okay with it.
We'll start w/ 2019 - Gun Deaths Inched Up in 2019Let us know when you figure out how many people we’ve collectively murdered.
So if Joe Redneck decides to go out in public w/ COVID-19 and gets your kids or my kids sick you're okay with that?You can give away what is yours and nobody cares. You are not entitled to decide what I will and won’t give away.
And the general public is responsible for its own protection. Maybe if you statist fools would come to that realization this nonsense would diminish.
Because Joe has a duty not to get other people sick and expose them to potential harm. If he does, then he should be held accountable. Not all of us have the ability to keep our kids locked in the house 24/7.Why are your kids out in public if you’re worried about that.
why don’t you mind your own damn business and take care of your own family and stay out of joe’s business.
Because Joe has a duty not to get other people sick and expose them to potential harm. If he does, then he should be held accountable. Not all of us have the ability to keep our kids locked in the house 24/7.

If he poses a risk to the health and safety of others, then yes he does.But Joe has the ability to keep himself barred away 24/7?
I’m now convinced you misspelled butthurt when created your account.
View attachment 271077
Letting you people decide who lives and dies seriously concerns me as based on what I've read on this board most of you are not capable of being very rational.
And again the great majority of gun deaths are suicides and criminals shooting each other. And no gun death has come from me owning a firearm, so your point is moot as usualWe'll start w/ 2019 - Gun Deaths Inched Up in 2019
Joe has a duty to take care of himself and his family. You have the same duty to yours. So why don’t you take care of your family and leave joe the hell alone and mind your own damn business. And stop inventing bull **** reasons to push more statist leaning damn government over reach FFS.Because Joe has a duty not to get other people sick and expose them to potential harm. If he does, then he should be held accountable. Not all of us have the ability to keep our kids locked in the house 24/7.
So if Joe Redneck decides to go out in public w/ COVID-19 and gets your kids or my kids sick you're okay with that?
You're playing the old J. S. Mill "harm principle" argument pretty heavily here, which is fine, but if you're that worried about people being irresponsible, you could, in fact, have the "ability" to keep the kids locked in the house 24/7 by putting deadbolts on the outside. Just sayin'.Because Joe has a duty not to get other people sick and expose them to potential harm. If he does, then he should be held accountable. Not all of us have the ability to keep our kids locked in the house 24/7.
This is classic leftism! He holds everybody else responsible for HIS safety. HIS responsibility is precisely zero. Awesome.Does joe redneck know he has Covid-19? What were the circumstances that placed your kids under 6’ away from Joe Redneck? Did you take reasonable precautions with your kids while they were out?
Because Joe has a duty not to get other people sick and expose them to potential harm. If he does, then he should be held accountable. Not all of us have the ability to keep our kids locked in the house 24/7.
I don’t think he’s a lawyer. He has yet to put forth a single cogent argument to articulate why his feelz trump others rights. F him.This is why I believe you are a lawyer . “ Joe “ doesn’t have a duty to you or your family . Joe has as much right to be out as anyone does . If you think he has something .. stay away from Joe .
