Gun control debate (merged)

#12,176
#12,176
bnhunt said:
I am not the arbiter who lives and dies. The woman with the right to choose is. She is the one who has to face the consequences of that decision. You have no right to make that decision for her as it does not effect you directly. Gun control effects all of us directly. That is the difference.
Click to expand...

My firearms have never , in anyway , under any circumstances , effected you , your family , your neighbors , anyone you’ve ever seen , heard about , or thought of . You and others like you are now demanding I give them up on the off chance they might , possible , could , one day in the future harm someone ? Horse Sh!t .
 
  • Like
Reactions: BennesseeVols, NurseGoodVol, DynaLo and 2 others
#12,177
#12,177
bnhunt said:
I am not the arbiter who lives and dies. The woman with the right to choose is. She is the one who has to face the consequences of that decision. You have no right to make that decision for her as it does not effect you directly. Gun control effects all of us directly. That is the difference.
Click to expand...
She is the one that dies during an abortion?

Learn something new every day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40, InVOLuntary and joevol33
#12,188
#12,188
luthervol said:
Any election held in Alabama, county elections outside of my county, etc....
Click to expand...
I told you so. You could see it coming, knowing how luther thinks.

iu
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Vol1321, InVOLuntary and joevol33
#12,189
#12,189
37L1 said:
Why stop there?

Nuclear warheads and delivery systems, infringement?

You need to study up on your Anti 2A talking points.
Click to expand...

He doesn’t want to stop there . Luther knows how to eat an elephant is one bite at a time . One law , one restriction, one ordinance at a time .
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
#12,190
#12,190
luthervol said:
Any election held in Alabama, county elections outside of my county, etc....
Click to expand...
You are banned? Or you cant physically be there to vote everywhere. Big difference. Also double or more voting is wrong for a reason, if you believe in the system any way.

As far as I am aware you could vote in any of those. So you dont have an argument here.
 
#12,192
#12,192
37L1 said:
Why stop there?

Nuclear warheads and delivery systems, infringement?

You need to study up on your Anti 2A talking points.
Click to expand...
Why?
There is obviously a line drawn between permissible and illegal.
Saying that drawing a line is an infringement is asinine.
The debate is strictly about where to draw that line.
 
#12,193
#12,193
LouderVol said:
You are banned? Or you cant physically be there to vote everywhere. Big difference. Also double or more voting is wrong for a reason, if you believe in the system any way.

As far as I am aware you could vote in any of those. So you dont have an argument here.
Click to expand...
I could not vote in any of those. I could not vote in GA and then drive across the state line and vote in Alabama.
I'm okay with that. I understand why restrictions are needed.
 
#12,194
#12,194
I hope these libs have stretched well, the way they have to contort to make all their ideology conform to some kind of logic. Really a bunch of mental gymnastics.
 
#12,195
#12,195
joevol33 said:
Seriously, this is your argument?🤣🤣 Might as well throw in a Russia, or Ukraine while you're typing 😂😂
Click to expand...
Just making the point that the elections I am legally allowed to participate in are restricted and determined by law.
And that is as it should be.
 
#12,196
#12,196
bnhunt said:
I am not the arbiter who lives and dies. The woman with the right to choose is. She is the one who has to face the consequences of that decision. You have no right to make that decision for her as it does not effect you directly. Gun control effects all of us directly. That is the difference.
Click to expand...

Gun control? What exactly is that?
 
#12,197
#12,197
luthervol said:
Why?
There is obviously a line drawn between permissible and illegal.
Saying that drawing a line is an infringement is asinine.
The debate is strictly about where to draw that line.
Click to expand...
And part of the debate that you are blind to, is that there have been many lines drawn already and you want to draw even more. Everyone who can see, knows where this eventually ends up, so hence the strong resistance.
 
#12,198
#12,198
37L1 said:
And part of the debate that you are blind to, is that there have been many lines drawn already and you want to draw even more. Everyone who can see, knows where this eventually ends up, so hence the strong resistance.
Click to expand...
The line has always and will always be debated. As it should be.
It's the asinine screeching that a line is somehow anti 2a that needs to stop.
 
#12,199
#12,199
bnhunt said:
FINALLY! A state with the guts to stand up to the NRA and do the right thing. If this legislation saves one child's life or any person's life, then it is worth it, which it certainly will.
Click to expand...
If a state bans AR 15s and that action will certainly save one child's life, then each type of weapon in use is equivalent to some number of children dying. If so, why not ban all firearms which would (by your assertion) save even more children's lives?
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top