Apparently CNN believes this to be important enough for print. SMH.
White Settlement church shooting: How the town got its name - CNN
I agree, if some law abiding citizen knew. With him being a felon, he likely got tge gun from someone who didn't obey the law. So how was anyone supposed to know he illegally bought the gun, let alone report it?Or maybe, just maybe, an enhanced sense of community responsibility and someone notifying the police with suspicions that he illegally possessed a firearm.
Wonder how many shootings people paying attention and saying something in advance would stop?
No doubt it happens currently. We simply never hear of it because it isn't "newsworthy".Or maybe, just maybe, an enhanced sense of community responsibility and someone notifying the police with suspicions that he illegally possessed a firearm.
Wonder how many shootings people paying attention and saying something in advance would stop?
I agree, if some law abiding citizen knew. With him being a felon, he likely got tge gun from someone who didn't obey the law. So how was anyone supposed to know he illegally bought the gun, let alone report it?
Wait what? It’s the community’s fault that the criminal chose to break the law and obtain a gun he wasn’t legally allowed to possess and go kill people with it?!Or maybe, just maybe, an enhanced sense of community responsibility and someone notifying the police with suspicions that he illegally possessed a firearm.
Wonder how many shootings people paying attention and saying something in advance would stop?
The Passing of the Peace has been renamed the Passing of the Piece.
The Lord be with you...
... And with your sidearm.
I grieve for what has become of our nation, when places of worship and places of learning are now places of fear. We must do what we must do in response.
Community awareness doesn’t replace an individual’s right to self defense.I know it's not going to stop every shooting, but the idea of people knowing what's going on around them and reporting never seems to come into the conversation. If it does, it's way far back in line behind "not my problem" and "make fun of people who want to explore other solutions."
Actually, most everything is behind the 'make fun of other people' option. Somewhat sad, IMHO.
Except then the libs complain about police involvement and overreach. Want it both waysI know it's not going to stop every shooting, but the idea of people knowing what's going on around them and reporting never seems to come into the conversation. If it does, it's way far back in line behind "not my problem" and "make fun of people who want to explore other solutions."
Actually, most everything is behind the 'make fun of other people' option. Somewhat sad, IMHO.
Or maybe, just maybe, an enhanced sense of community responsibility and someone notifying the police with suspicions that he illegally possessed a firearm.
Wonder how many shootings people paying attention and saying something in advance would stop?
You damn sure implied that stance in these posts from where I’m sitting.Where did I say that? I can't find it.
Or maybe, just maybe, an enhanced sense of community responsibility and someone notifying the police with suspicions that he illegally possessed a firearm.
Wonder how many shootings people paying attention and saying something in advance would stop?
I know it's not going to stop every shooting, but the idea of people knowing what's going on around them and reporting never seems to come into the conversation. If it does, it's way far back in line behind "not my problem" and "make fun of people who want to explore other solutions."
Actually, most everything is behind the 'make fun of other people' option. Somewhat sad, IMHO.
You damn sure implied that stance in these posts from where I’m sitting.
So because I forgot to use the words "in addition to more guns in the hands of good people," the assumption is automatically that I think they should be taken away?
I don't dabble in dualistic thinking. There are always spectrums of possibilities available, including some that can happen at the same time. Like increased community vigilance and increased carry.
When the automatic response to any suggestions that don't explicitly include more guns is that someone is trying to take guns, there's a whale of a psychological issue hiding underneath
Not buying it. Leading with “or maybe...” to me clearly says you’re pitching an alternative solution and not advocating your suggestion be in addition to the citizens being armed.So because I forgot to use the words "in addition to more guns in the hands of good people," the assumption is automatically that I think they should be taken away?
I don't dabble in dualistic thinking. There are always spectrums of possibilities available, including some that can happen at the same time. Like increased community vigilance and increased carry.
When the automatic response to any suggestions that don't explicitly include more guns is that someone is trying to take guns, there's a whale of a psychological issue hiding underneath
