Gun control debate (merged)

[luthervol]

Weapons that fire more than 60 rounds in 120 seconds.
The purchase of more than 1 firearm in 1 year.

wE onLy gEt to VoTe onCe per yEaR!!!

You can certainly throw out some unsupported claims. But no one outside of your same bubble really believe them, so I guess it's mostly inconsequential.

 

[kiddiedoc]

Weapons that fire more than x rounds in y seconds.
The purchase of more than x weapons in y time.

You understand that semi-auto weapons only fire x number of rounds equal to the number of times the trigger is pulled, correct? So, they all theoretically fire at the same rate, which is solely dependent on the shooter.

Do you want an electronic trigger delay? WTH are you talking about?

Or, do you want to ban all semi-auto weapons and revolvers? (Prob 85% of all guns sold)

 

[85SugarVol]

You can certainly throw out some unsupported claims. But no one outside of your same bubble really believe them, so I guess it's mostly inconsequential.

Are you now saying you didn’t say it?

 

[luthervol]

You understand that semi-auto weapons only fire x number of rounds equal to the number of times the trigger is pulled, correct? So, they all theoretically fire at the same rate, which is solely dependent on the shooter.

Do you want an electronic trigger delay? WTH are you talking about?

Or, do you want to ban all semi-auto weapons and revolvers? (Prob 85% of all guns sold)

There are more factors than simply pulling the trigger. You can pull the trigger as fast as you wish, but if there is no ammo, who cares.

 

[luthervol]

Are you now saying you didn’t say it?

I'm saying I don't remember saying it, and if I did, the context would be critical.

So I am saying you are completely misrepresenting what I said.

And I'm positive I've never said anything like one gun per year. (and I'm assuming you know that)

 

[85SugarVol]

I'm saying I don't remember saying it, and if I did, the context would be critical.

So I am saying you are completely misrepresenting what I said.

And I'm positive I've never said anything like one gun per year. (and I'm assuming you know that)

If you claim you’ve never made the link between voting once per year, and what a reasonable limit on gun purchases is - I’ll take you at your word.

 

[kiddiedoc]

There are more factors than simply pulling the trigger. You can pull the trigger as fast as you wish, but if there is no ammo, who cares.

So tell us your enlightened proposal. Manual loaders only, no mags? That would eliminate nearly every pistol and prob 75% of rifles. How would the population be able to stand against a tyrannical government with that type of disadvantage?

I have an idea: we should go back to the Wild West days, when it was lever action, revolvers, and shotguns. You know, when nobody was shooting anyone?

 

[luthervol]

So tell us your enlightened proposal. Manual loaders only, no mags? That would eliminate nearly every pistol and prob 75% of rifles. How would the population be able to stand against a tyrannical government with that type of disadvantage?

I have an idea: we should go back to the Wild West days, when it was lever action, revolvers, and shotguns. You know, when nobody was shooting anyone?

I'm the opinion that there is a rational and reasonable compromise somewhere between the Wild West days and what we have today.

And the standing against a tyrannical government angle is pointless. (They have fully automatic - plus nukes, planes, and such)

 

[85SugarVol]

I'm the opinion that there is a rational and reasonable compromise somewhere between the Wild West days and what we have today.

And the standing against a tyrannical government angle is pointless. (They have fully automatic - plus nukes, planes, and such)

It’s not about going toe to toe with the United States Military - that’s a losing proposition for every country on Earth.

It’s about what comes after. You understand that, right? It’s the long, bloody insurgency on home soil.

 

[C-south]

Weapons that fire more than x rounds in y seconds.
The purchase of more than x weapons in y time.

Another ridiculously idiotic post.

 

[C-south]

I'm the opinion that there is a rational and reasonable compromise somewhere between the Wild West days and what we have today.

And the standing against a tyrannical government angle is pointless. (They have fully automatic - plus nukes, planes, and such)

You are neither rational or reasonable or intelligent enough to discuss anything related to firearms or much else.

 

[joevol33]

Weapons that fire more than x rounds in y seconds.
The purchase of more than x weapons in y time.

As long as your people are on the streets attacking innocent people, then banning weapons that fire more than x amount of rounds is off the table. There's a reason they don't do that crap here, cause they know many have those weapons, and they'd rightfully get put down. Learn your side how to protest, not riot.

 

[luthervol]

It’s not about going toe to toe with the United States Military - that’s a losing proposition for every country on Earth.

It’s about what comes after. You understand that, right? It’s the long, bloody insurgency on home soil.

Seems like a stupid thing to concern yourself with. It's like worrying about invaders from Mars, zombies, or Godzilla.

 

[luthervol]

Another ridiculously idiotic post.

I would certainly expect you to claim to think so.

 

[85SugarVol]

Seems like a stupid thing to concern yourself with. It's like worrying about invaders from Mars, zombies, or Godzilla.

I don’t concern myself with it. It is completely unpalatable, for good reason.

 

[CagleMtnVol]

Why do I feel like there's way more to this story than what the article has?

How does someone not 70+YO not know their own car or where they parked it?

 

[hog88]

When someone uses the term “rational and reasonable” it’s a tell. A tell that they are neither and are a liar.

 

[C-south]

I would certainly expect you to claim to think so.

Of course you do. You believe most people have access to weapons that shoot over 1000 rounds per minute and semi automatic weapons have a fire rate that can be regulated.

 

[CagleMtnVol]

When someone uses the term “rational and reasonable” it’s a tell. A tell that they are neither and are a liar.

Don't forget "Common Sense Gun Laws"

 

[C-south]

When someone uses the term “rational and reasonable” it’s a tell. A tell that they are neither and are a liar.

“We need common sense gun laws that regulate weapons we know nothing about “. If you heard any of the recent arguments about the pistol brace debacle you know just how dumb they are. Somehow removing the brace makes it LESS concealable. The brace is essentially a bump stock. Then you have the ATF who over a decade ago said it was good to go. Now their director wants to make them illegal while he’s admittedly not a firearm expert and can’t define what an “assault weapon” is.

 

[luthervol]

When someone uses the term “rational and reasonable” it’s a tell. A tell that they are neither and are a liar.

That's certainly stupid.

 

[C-south]

That's certainly stupid.

Like believing a semiautomatic weapon shoots over 1000 rounds in a minute?

 

[K-town Vol Fan]

Man Who Shot Ralph Yarl Watched Fox News Nonstop and Said 'Racist Things,' Grandson Says

Shocker.

 

[hog88]

Don't forget "Common Sense Gun Laws"

I’ve already said anyone using “common sense” when discussing gun regulations has none.

 

[luthervol]

Like believing a semiautomatic weapon shoots over 1000 rounds in a minute?

No one ever said that. I was talking about fully automatic. But it's not like you guys don't get it wrong constantly.