volgr
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2012
- Messages
- 8,165
- Likes
- 8,563
They both seem to have viable arguments.This is what Progressives are fired up about here in the United States -
View attachment 547092
This is what Progressives are fired up about there in the United Kingdom -
View attachment 547093
It is the exact same argument.
Perceived? The only way to do that is to offer equitable outcomes....... If you do that, the producers will quit producing and the system falls apart.Laws and regulations on alcohol and drugs. Education. Responsible birth control. An economic system that is perceived as being fair.
I have no problem with them removing "head splitter" from the blade.Uh huh.
Their “common sense” proposal is to remove the intimidating writing down the side of the blade.
Wonder what their subsequent “common sense” proposal will be when that doesn’t work![]()
lol....Outcomes should most definitely be equitable. Did you stumble over your own tongue?Perceived? The only way to do that is to offer equitable outcomes....... If you do that, the producers will quit producing and the system falls apart.
Socialism just doesn't work.
So you have no problem with "little boy butt splitters" being written on the packaging of condoms and that being their marketing angle?Of course you wouldn’t. Head Splitter does nothing to increase the lethality of the blade.
It would be absolutely meaningless. Just a necessary step in the process of banning the knife outright.
