Im aware thats how it works, but why the hell would you subtract the results of pass play (sack) from the results of all your running plays? How the hell does that make any sense?
He was trying to throw the ball, wasnt intending to run the ball.....do it the way the NFL does it imo, subtract sacks from passing totals....lines up much better, is much more logical and defines the effectiveness of your respective running and passing games.
For example, what if were lining up and having great success running the ball in a half, say 20 rushes for 150 yards, 7.5 yards per rush....our OL is opening holes, were gashing the defense, moving the ball at will on the ground. But, we take 7 sacks for -65 yards because pass blocking isnt our OLs strength and/or our qb is holding the ball too long. All of a sudden, our rushing stats show 20 rushes for 85 yards....how is that a fair representation of our running game?....especially when its the passing game failures that are skewing our rushing results. Makes no sense.
Also, all I was doing by showing Jarretts actual rushing totals was to prove that hes not a statue who cant run. Is he hesitant? Yes. Is he indecisive oftentimes in the pocket? Yes. But when he does run, hes being fairly effective at nearly 4.5 yards per carry. Hes no Joshua Dobbs running, but hes also no Casey Clausen.
To me, its as Hoke said today in his presser....a big development item for JG is for him to be better at timing passes, and to be better at trusting that his WRs will be where theyre supposed to be.....which tells me that his WRs are rarely where theyre supposed to be so he doesnt trust them.
Experience and good qb and wr coaching will make JG and our passing game look light years better imo.
Edit: BTW, Ainge just on the radio saying Jarrett is only missing the coaching of the knowledge of the game, has everything else, every other quality to be a great quarterback.