Agreed
I just don't know if Tee would agree to that deal.
So you are ignoring overall defense which is what we were discussing.
But he did well for the talent and is well repected.
What about the Ohio State team he was dc for? They had a top twenty defense. What about UGA? Top 5 this year.
He has success at every level.
6th in 2011 but whatever.
He has the number four defense this year.
Has a better resume than Kirby Smart did when UGA hired him. Better resume than Pruitt.
He is a good coach.
Tucker might make a good head coach. But why hire someone who might make a good head coach? Fans have a very high level of confidence in a couple of head coaches, who are available. What kind of person passes up head coaches who poll high levels of confidence, to promote someone who might make it? We have already done that, and we are tired of it.
The talent was the same? I just named 1/3 of the entire defense they replaced, with superior talent, in 1 offseason. By 2016 there was 1 starter from the 2014 team that was still left, Christian Jones and he became a backup and only started 2 games. Yes they went through a scheme change, but those teams under Trestman and Phil Emery were seriously lacking in talent. Ryan Pace has had rebuild the entire roster, it stunk. Wanna guess how many players from Mel's defenses in Chicago are currently starting elsewhere? Only 6 and only 2 of those 6 are full time starters. Basically Mel had 2 starters who would start for other NFL teams, 4 starters who would be backups for other teams, and 15-20 guys who wouldn't (and aren't) even make other teams rosters. But yeah the guy had talent to work with...
Wrong on both counts. Considering the pejorative manner in which you're assuming Phil's intentions and his love for UT, if I suggested that you should investigate Tucker's resume, you'd declare some other shallow excuse to dismiss the man's qualifications. Maybe we couldn't always get the very best results from Coach Fulmer's efforts (but usually we did), but I'll assure you whatever the results, AD Fulmer's thinking of UT's football program and isn't being a shallow drama prince, as you've alliterated. If Tucker's the guy, I'll back up Phil's choice.If it's Tucker, then Fulmer made no effort other than to find a coach that he could control. If it doesn't end well it should be the last thing he ever has to do with this Athletic Department.
I really need someone to explain how mel tucker wouldnt be justified as a hire. his resume is excellent. been at big programs had success. NFL d coordinator with success. Sorry he wasnt fired by another school before we can get our hands on him. I dont get the infatuation with having to be a head coach before. most of them are castoffs by other programs.