casual-observer
Pantone 151C
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2017
- Messages
- 389
- Likes
- 1,247
Thank you for this, I think you said it better than I was trying.To be fair, Kirby hadn’t often run into teams with better talent thanks to his recruiting. Of the 7 times he did, 6 were against the GOAT and 1 was on the road against the only team with better talent. Kirby is in the top echelon of current coaches but I do get what you’re saying regarding his coaching outside of recruiting. He would certainly have at least 1 more win against Saban if not for some poor in-game decisions. I don’t think he’s elite on Saturdays but he’s elite the rest of the time and that makes his job easier on Saturdays. If given equal talent, I’d take Heupel though.
"poor in-game decisions"...remember that time he shuffled Justin Fields out on the field for a fake punt?
College football is a tri-fecta:
#1 - You have to RECRUIT
#2 - You have to DEVELOP THE TALENT IN YOUR LOCKER ROOM
#3 - You have to ADJUST IN REAL TIME to the in-game situations
Saban excelled in all three areas - ELITE.
Dooly - didn't recruit worth a darn.
Jones - couldn't develop his talent
Pruitt - could not adjust in real time (almost always beat after the half)
Urban Meyer, good at all three.
Steve Spurrier, one of if not THE BEST at in-game adjustments. You always knew he was going to come out an whip you in the second half.
Kirby...I personally think he is a baboon in-game strategist. If not for talent that is at a minimum 4-stars three deep, he would lose even more games. And with the changes we've seen with NIL, his days of out-jimmie-and-joe-ing the competition are numbered.
Heupel is a great schemer. Halzle - I'm not so sure. I don't know if Halzle's issue is his talent or on-field talent.
Oh and one more thing, #1 - RECRUIT is now be supplanted with: SHOP THE PORTAL.