orangeluvr
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2010
- Messages
- 14,478
- Likes
- 6,211
I love PS--but Geno was and is a better coach. That's just a fact. PS made a lot of hay in the early years of women's basketball--and that doesn't take anything away from her ENORMOUS accomplishments and ENORMOUS contributions to the growth of women's basketball. Others always come along...If PS had started coaching the same year that Geno did--and I have to check to see how much later he started--we wouldn't have 8 titles. I noticed how well coached Ct. was very early on, before he had good players. If you know basketball it is easy to see which teams are well coached and which are not: well coached teams do not make a lot of the mistakes. It was/is the same with McGraw: For a long time she did not have much talent--but ND was competitive because it was well coached, and now ND gets talent. I recall the UT-Ct. championship game when Taurasi was a senior. Other than Taurasi, Ct. had a very young team. UT had Lawson and a good forward whose name I've forgottten, a veteran team. Geno beat us in the title game. Telling.
Geno coaches like PS AND is a much better offensive coach. This has been true from the start. I have thought for 15 years that, first PS & staff, and now Warlick & Staff, would recognize this--but they don't, as our offensive execution is still terrible. Do you see Ct. on offense? The players always know what they are doing. They are an excellent passing team while our passing has been somewhere between average and bad for 20 years.
I don't say all this because I like Ct. I don't like Ct. I have been complaining about our mediocre coaching for one simple reason: Because I didn't want to see happen what happened last night--and which I KNEW would happen: geno passes PS for the most titles. I didn't want it to happen--but you could see it coming because the two programs have been moving in opposite directions for years. The truth is, UT has been struggling--by our standards-- for a LONG time. PS coached too long and the law of diminishing returns/burnout kicked in, big-time. Anybody who thinks that someone coaches as well in years, say, 25-32 as they did in years, say, 5-15 knows nothing about coaching.
There was nothing to be done about it. PS was/is a legend, and she was going to coach as long as she wanted: She was the Joe Paterno of women's basketball--and Paterno coached WAY, WAY, too long. Penn. State was a national power during the first 20 years of Paterno career--and almost never better than mediocre the last 20 years of his reign. Sound familiar? UT has been better than mediocre--but not by much. We've been going through a long transition period and will continue to go through it until we get a first-rate coach and staff. I'm not really knocking Warlick--she spent almost her entire career (roughly 30 years!) as an assistant/friend of Pat. It is very hard to suddenly become a good head coach when you've been an assistant for that long--doesn't happen, and it is not happening for UT. We will need to get our act together if we want to be a power program again. Warlick has actually improved the recruiting, but that's not what I worry about.
Everybody "knows" but doesn't want to talk about it. I'd say its fairly obvious if you ask me...
The pink elephant in the room when it comes to women's basketball recruiting.
Pat will go down in history as the woman who pretty much single-handedly put women's college basketball on the map. All Geno will be remembered for is this:
View attachment 76176
It's pretty irrelevant who is the better coach as PS isn't coaching anymore. They came in at different times in the sport so it's a difficult comparison but both have achieved greatness. By far, Geno is the best active coach in the game...and that is a hard pill to swallow for big time LV fans like me! Let's move on and concentrate on the future and hope our current coaching staff and players can improve and start competing with the likes of ND and UCONN again. As always, Go LVs!
And so do I, but if she had the courage to publicly accuse Auriemma, she should have had the courage to publicly state her reasons and her proof. By not doing so she hurt women's basketball and she lessened her own reputation - at least outside of the UT Nation.
I love PS--but Geno was and is a better coach. That's just a fact. PS made a lot of hay in the early years of women's basketball--and that doesn't take anything away from her ENORMOUS accomplishments and ENORMOUS contributions to the growth of women's basketball. Others always come along...If PS had started coaching the same year that Geno did--and I have to check to see how much later he started--we wouldn't have 8 titles. I noticed how well coached Ct. was very early on, before he had good players. If you know basketball it is easy to see which teams are well coached and which are not: well coached teams do not make a lot of the mistakes. It was/is the same with McGraw: For a long time she did not have much talent--but ND was competitive because it was well coached, and now ND gets talent. I recall the UT-Ct. championship game when Taurasi was a senior. Other than Taurasi, Ct. had a very young team. UT had Lawson and a good forward whose name I've forgottten, a veteran team. Geno beat us in the title game. Telling.
Geno coaches like PS AND is a much better offensive coach. This has been true from the start. I have thought for 15 years that, first PS & staff, and now Warlick & Staff, would recognize this--but they don't, as our offensive execution is still terrible. Do you see Ct. on offense? The players always know what they are doing. They are an excellent passing team while our passing has been somewhere between average and bad for 20 years.
I don't say all this because I like Ct. I don't like Ct. I have been complaining about our mediocre coaching for one simple reason: Because I didn't want to see happen what happened last night--and which I KNEW would happen: geno passes PS for the most titles. I didn't want it to happen--but you could see it coming because the two programs have been moving in opposite directions for years. The truth is, UT has been struggling--by our standards-- for a LONG time. PS coached too long and the law of diminishing returns/burnout kicked in, big-time. Anybody who thinks that someone coaches as well in years, say, 25-32 as they did in years, say, 5-15 knows nothing about coaching.
There was nothing to be done about it. PS was/is a legend, and she was going to coach as long as she wanted: She was the Joe Paterno of women's basketball--and Paterno coached WAY, WAY, too long. Penn. State was a national power during the first 20 years of Paterno career--and almost never better than mediocre the last 20 years of his reign. Sound familiar? UT has been better than mediocre--but not by much. We've been going through a long transition period and will continue to go through it until we get a first-rate coach and staff. I'm not really knocking Warlick--she spent almost her entire career (roughly 30 years!) as an assistant/friend of Pat. It is very hard to suddenly become a good head coach when you've been an assistant for that long--doesn't happen, and it is not happening for UT. We will need to get our act together if we want to be a power program again. Warlick has actually improved the recruiting, but that's not what I worry about.
As great as she may have been, Summitt committed multiple unforced errors in that whole debacle. The first was answering the questions in the manner she did at SEC media days while the mens program was under NCAA investigation in Knoxville. It made a lot of people wonder if she was referring to Pearl or UConn--which is why Hymas asked her for clarification.
At the point if I am her I blow that question off with a generality about the state of recruiting in the womens game blah blah blah. No harm no foul.
Instead she went all in and called out UConn. Pat Summitt prided herself on being more prepared for competition than anyone, but her preparation for the aftermath of that answer was sub-par at best. The answer just didn't make sense. So Maya Moore got a tour of ESPN? That's it really? It didn't make sense to anyone who follows the sport. Then we defaulted to this we won't talk about it. Which leads to one of three conclusions:
1. UConn didn't cheat which makes the whole episode a lie.
2. UConn does cheat beyond an ESPN tour including cash and work to parents of recruits. But is this it? Why would they be afraid to expose this? Not enough evidence? Then why target UConn and make the comment to begin with. Too prideful to apologize? Just doesn't add up.
3. This has nothing to do with ESPN, cash and jobs to parents. This has to do with the pink elephant in the room in womens basketball. But again, knowing you can't go there for multiple valid reasons why go there? This is the only thing that makes sense to me--but it doesn't because I thought Pat was smarter than this.
Apparently Husky fans are just as douchey as Geno.