General Neyland and Phillip Fulmer

#201
#201
hatvol96 said:
After your idiotic assertion that Fulmer's hiring jumpstarted the program, there was no reason to respond with substance. Your special level of density is immune to fact. The best part is, it showed the you didn't even have the faintest idea when he came on the staff. Typical Fulmer loving knownothing.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

This applies to you, actually. And it's funny you didn't know when Johnny's best run was.

That's how you roll, but it's G, S, M to utgibbs.
 
Last edited:
#202
#202
utgibbs said:
Which actually highlights the ridiculousness of your "where's Phil?" argument.

It puts the "Phil was paying to get AD's to listen to him" argument (Hat's I believe, not yours DVD) in the proper perspective.
Click to expand...

This isn't true at all. The post suggesting that Fulmer is a "movie star" who "isn't looking for a coaching job" was one of the most ridiculous ones in this thread, as neither point is nowhere close to true, but you were too busy saying "G, S, M" to apparently notice that you were getting owned.
 
#203
#203
utgibbs said:
This applies to you, actually. And it's funny you didn't know when Johnny's best run was.

That's how you roll, but it's G, S, M to utgibbs.
Click to expand...
Without serious help, Fulmer's lack if even the faintest hints of accountability and discipline doomed him. His offensive genus on thise loaded squads is clearly overstated here. You can see that when he lost his best recruiters and lone discipline / accountability coach, he went to total crap. Get over it. Unless he was going to hire great assistants, he sucked. When he started thinking he was the reason for success and hired people like Sanders whom he could lord over, he was embarrassing. Your selective facts and ludicrous proclaiming of victory says to me you wouldn't know a football coach if he hit you in the mouth.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#204
#204
utgibbs said:
This applies to you, actually. And it's funny you didn't know when Johnny's best run was.

That's how you roll, but it's G, S, M to utgibbs.
Click to expand...
I know exactly when it was. You, on the other hand, tried to act like it came immediatley following the hiring of Fulmer. That simply proved you actually know nothing about UT football history and are simply another University of Fulmer suckup. The next valid point you make here will be your first.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#208
#208
99gator said:
i don't understand the revisionism regarding fulmer.

fulmer won 10 games or more in 2001, 2003, 2004, and 2007.

bottom line, some of those "declining" years fulmer had were better than majority of seasons in tennessee history. tennessee has 20 seasons with 10 or more wins in its history. fulmer has nine of them.

if you think that is easy because more games are played now, i encourage you to count how many seasons tennessee goes through before having another ten win season.

it will be fun to follow this board to see how long one of the best coaches tennessee ever had is blamed for tennessee's current state of affairs
Click to expand...

Until the 80's, few teams played 10 games in an entire season.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#213
#213
utgibbs said:
This applies to you, actually. And it's funny you didn't know when Johnny's best run was.

That's how you roll, but it's G, S, M to utgibbs.
Click to expand...
Are you even old enough to remember Johnny's tenure? Based on the maturity level of these posts I'm guessing that you're about 15.
 
#214
#214
its funny how the fulmer haters want to get on here and make ridiculous statements about phil taking over the best situation in the history of college football and when you point out the FACT that tennessee was on a 3 game losing when phil took over they act like it never happened. Well guess what. It did
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#215
#215
BigOrangePassion1 said:
its funny how the fulmer haters want to get on here and make ridiculous statements about phil taking over the best situation in the history of college football and when you point out the FACT that tennessee was on a 3 game losing when phil took over they act like it never happened. Well guess what. It did
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

we just aren't sure what 3 games UT lost prior to Phil taking over. Could you please list them?
 
#216
#216
BigOrangePassion1 said:
its funny how the fulmer haters want to get on here and make ridiculous statements about phil taking over the best situation in the history of college football and when you point out the FACT that tennessee was on a 3 game losing when phil took over they act like it never happened. Well guess what. It did
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Why are you pointing this out? So what that UT had lost the previous 3 games by a combined 9 points?
 
#217
#217
BigOrangePassion1 said:
its funny how the fulmer haters want to get on here and make ridiculous statements about phil taking over the best situation in the history of college football and when you point out the FACT that tennessee was on a 3 game losing when phil took over they act like it never happened. Well guess what. It did
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...
Remind me again when Fulmer took over.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#218
#218
Hobock said:
Until the 80's, few teams played 10 games in an entire season.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Nothing lasts forever. I was there screaming that the game had passed Majors by. I was there screaming that Fulmer had gotten complacent. Luckily for Fulmer he won some games early( and beat Bama). Majors is still pulling knives outta his back. Nothing lasts forever. Endings are ugly. Otherwise, there would be no end.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#219
#219
im pointing it out because it destroys you terrible argument. Obiously taking over a team on a 3 losing streak in the middle of the season is not even close to the best situation to take over a team.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#220
#220
BigOrangePassion1 said:
im pointing it out because it destroys you terrible argument. Obiously taking over a team on a 3 losing streak in the middle of the season is not even close to the best situation to take over a team.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...
Except for the fact that's not when he took over. For someone who babbles on and on about UT's history, you're about straight up damn ignorant about it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#221
#221
BigOrangePassion1 said:
im pointing it out because it destroys you terrible argument. Obiously taking over a team on a 3 losing streak in the middle of the season is not even close to the best situation to take over a team.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Oh, that's what I thought. I just didn't want to type out that dumb of a thought.

UT was 36-6-2 prior to that 3 game stretch (since 1989). Good point Einstein.
 
#223
#223
BigOrangePassion1 said:
im pointing it out because it destroys you terrible argument. Obiously taking over a team on a 3 losing streak in the middle of the season is not even close to the best situation to take over a team.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Fulmer pulled a hostile takeover of a VERY talented team. If you're arguing against that, then you really don't know what your talking about.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top