KingNick865
THE #1 COLLEGE DIFFENCE
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Messages
- 14,070
- Likes
- 0
It amazes me that Kiffin had such a strong influence on some fans they are actually becoming USC fans. For a guy that did next to nothing for UT in the long run, it baffles me.
I want somebody to post a link of anyone on here having Derek Dooley on their wishlist.
Boise St. has a history of good football. Their overall winning percentage, as a football program from the start is over 70%, and that's overall not just their D-1 FBS record.
Kiffin's approach to coaching appeals to me. Dooley's does not. Its not that I think Dooley is a bad coach, recruiter, or a role model. Nor do I necessarily believe he will fail, although I am reserving my judgement for now. But I did like what Kiffin was doing.
I feel as though this is why some people still have lingering feelings for Kiffin. Everyone is stung by his actions, but when you compare the excitment that Kiffin brought to the mundane, tight-closed door approach of Dooley, its not hard to see why.
I still will continue to cheer against USC, unless it is against a Big 10 oponent.
I actually recall there being a thread started during the early hours of the coaching search that did suggest Dooley as the replacement. It was to no surprise lost in the countless threads devoted to Stoops, Muschamp, Gruden, and I think Calhoun (?).
I wouldnt say he was high on the wishlist, but there was no general oposition to him either. There was not a general complaint until the lack of recruiting dazzle and the anti-media practices of Dooley came out.
More myth. Here's the facts:
Inherited Players
Auburn
5*: 1
4*: 19
2010 NFL Draft Picks: 2
Tennessee
5*: 5
4*: 22
2010 NFL Draft Picks: 6
Auburn also had less depth in overall numbers and had fewer top-tier recruiting commits when Chizik took over compared to Kiffin.
Chizik will never win his division.
I still think it's an awful hire.
A&M, Kansas, Kansas St., Iowa would all work over every single member of the WAC like they were a high school team. With the possible exception of Boise St.
I'm seriously trying to understand why the majority of people on here are so excited about him. That's why I brought that up.
And of course there was no real opposition to him before he was hired. Nobody except for a couple of people even knew who he was.
Ok, and yet there is significantly more resources at Michigan State than there ever will be at La. Tech. It's not like Dooley was the HC of Texas and couldn't win with their talent. Go look up Ruston, LS, and ask yourself who the heck would ever be successful there.
