I would hope to lend some objectivity to the debate with my reply to the thread, but I'm not sure if it's possible with the hardened positions many of us have taken.
I would have liked to have kept Fulmer for the following reasons: He played for UT, was an Assistant for UT, was Johnny Major's best recruiter, had been promoted from OL to Offensive Coordinator and Assistant Head Coach, was named interim HC, took over the program and won a National Championship. He's a Tennessee guy who exceeded anyone's expectations. His program's eventual decline never reached the depths that it is at now. Anyone who thinks Phillip would have gutted the program of players and tradition and National Stature as is playing out before us is exaggerating his failure as a coach.
I would have liked to have had Lane Kiffin and his coaching staff around longer than a year to see what he could have done. He would have struggled this year for sure, but if he didn't land most of his players in jail or the University on probation, I believe he would have been very successful at UT. However, I would not have wanted to see LK succeed in "his way" over the Tennessee way in the end, and I'm glad he's gone. I would have taken some mediocre years with Johnny or Phil before trashing Tennessee's traditions.
None of us could have expected the adversity that Derek Dooley is now facing. Of all the coaching options availableto Mike Hamilton; Fulmer, Kiffin, Muschamp, Cutcliffe, etc., I truly believe Dooley is the best guy for the job right now. I think he has all the right answers for what Tennessee needs. Granted, there was a good arguement for change before firing PF.....but if anyone thought that firing Fulmer was going to land Tennessee this far out of contention.....NOBODY would have asked for the change.
Ironically, Tennessee may have landed the right person for the job. If DD leaves for greener pastures within the next 2 years, then I think we all will admit the terrible mistake. If however he turns the program around and stays long enough to compare himself to Fulmer and Neyland, or Dickey and Majors, then the change might have been worth it.
Blaming Fulmer for everything that happened after his termination is foolish.