I really don't who to trust TBH. To sabotage the coaching search process while destroying the university's reputation for personal gain is a whole new level of backstabbing corruption.
The thought of him sabotaging Currie's tenure scares me from a trust aspect, but Currie was the worst AD I've ever experienced in my life. So Fulmer may have done us a favor in sparing us from years of poor management (although Currie may have done 10 years worth of damage).
On the other hand, I think Fulmer lives and breathes UT football. So here's to hoping he does absolutely everything he can to get us back to the top.
The thought of him sabotaging Currie's tenure scares me from a trust aspect, but Currie was the worst AD I've ever experienced in my life. So Fulmer may have done us a favor in sparing us from years of poor management (although Currie may have done 10 years worth of damage).
On the other hand, I think Fulmer lives and breathes UT football. So here's to hoping he does absolutely everything he can to get us back to the top.
I really don't who to trust TBH. To sabotage the coaching search process while destroying the university's reputation for personal gain is a whole new level of backstabbing corruption.
Does that really justify the backstabbing and ruining of Currie? To me, this is an ethical issue.
Intentionally sabotaging the coaching search for power at the expense of the university just isn't right in any way, shape, or form.
Edit: I'm NOT defending Currie's ineptitude however.
May have been the only way to break Haslam control