Fulmer Needs To Take The Wheel

#1

VolunteerHillbilly

Spike Drinks, Not Trees
Joined
Sep 26, 2005
Messages
40,785
Likes
15,226
#1
Never thought I'd say this, but the time has come for the only person who can clean this mess up to step in. He's obviously got booster backing or he would not be athletic director. Seems to get along with Boyd and Plowman. Fan reaction would be mixed, but the nostalgia factor would bring people around. We'd have to give him a raise but I don't think he'd demand much. Give him a few years to pass Neyland's career wins record and teach some guys how to be a head coach. In-state recruiting would pick up.
 
#4
#4
Fulmer lives in an era of college football antiquity. The game has changed. We need an offense that can put up points and a bend but don’t break defense. We need a HC that is innovative and understands that offense wins games now. Period. He needs to cut bait with Pruitt and move forward
 
#10
#10
That's probably going to be a common gut reaction, but the longer you chew on it the more you'll come to realize that he is the man for the moment. There is nobody else.
Disagree. There are plenty of coaches that could correct this..,,but UT is unwilling to make the changes
 
#14
#14
Never thought I'd say this, but the time has come for the only person who can clean this mess up to step in. He's obviously got booster backing or he would not be athletic director. Seems to get along with Boyd and Plowman. Fan reaction would be mixed, but the nostalgia factor would bring people around. We'd have to give him a raise but I don't think he'd demand much. Give him a few years to pass Neyland's career wins record and teach some guys how to be a head coach. In-state recruiting would pick up.

If Phlegmatic Phil waddles out there as HC I am totally done with Tennessee Football.

You should have gone with that first instinct to never say this.
 
#15
#15
Fulmer lives in an era of college football antiquity. The game has changed. We need an offense that can put up points and a bend but don’t break defense. We need a HC that is innovative and understands that offense wins games now. Period. He needs to cut bait with Pruitt and move forward
We need a bridge to the future. I'd love to get someone like you describe and have him here for a couple of decades, but we can't seem to attract a top tier candidate and nobody can agree on who to go after from the ranks of damaged characters and inexperienced guys. Fulmer has enough credibility to get a decent staff put together. He'd probably do more with Pruitt's staff than what Pruitt was able to do. If I could see another path forward, I'd be on it. Right now, it's do nothing and ride it out with Pruitt for a couple more years or let the battle captain put the whistle back on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grey_pilgrim
#17
#17
I think as Vol fans with pretty severe bvs we just aren't thinking clearly. If you study Stockholm syndrome at all, one of the things hostages will do during an extended traumatic situation is bargain with themselves, lowering standards and accepting something negative to what they believe to be a compromise...........its ok OP, I'm holding out hope that UT is going to roll out mass counselors for us soon. 🇺🇸
 
#20
#20
Never thought I'd say this, but the time has come for the only person who can clean this mess up to step in. He's obviously got booster backing or he would not be athletic director. Seems to get along with Boyd and Plowman. Fan reaction would be mixed, but the nostalgia factor would bring people around. We'd have to give him a raise but I don't think he'd demand much. Give him a few years to pass Neyland's career wins record and teach some guys how to be a head coach. In-state recruiting would pick up.
Fulmer and Pruitt should both be fired immediately.
 
#21
#21
Never thought I'd say this, but the time has come for the only person who can clean this mess up to step in. He's obviously got booster backing or he would not be athletic director. Seems to get along with Boyd and Plowman. Fan reaction would be mixed, but the nostalgia factor would bring people around. We'd have to give him a raise but I don't think he'd demand much. Give him a few years to pass Neyland's career wins record and teach some guys how to be a head coach. In-state recruiting would pick up.
Take the wheel?
Bc the ship needs to fully go off the cliff?
Thats about all he would accomplish
 
#22
#22
If it happened, which I seriously doubt, it's going to be for stabilization purposes only. We're not going to compete for the East or anything like that; though I'm sure we'll get those type of pumpers who come out saying he'll have us back competing.

Granted we're not competing for the East for a good while anyway.
 
#24
#24
We need a bridge to the future. I'd love to get someone like you describe and have him here for a couple of decades, but we can't seem to attract a top tier candidate and nobody can agree on who to go after from the ranks of damaged characters and inexperienced guys. Fulmer has enough credibility to get a decent staff put together. He'd probably do more with Pruitt's staff than what Pruitt was able to do. If I could see another path forward, I'd be on it. Right now, it's do nothing and ride it out with Pruitt for a couple more years or let the battle captain put the whistle back on.
Oh we can attract a top tier candidate. Problem is, UT refuses to pony up the money to do it, unlike Bama, OSU, Texas A&M, Texas, etc
 
Advertisement



Back
Top