Fulmer Just BBQ'd Kiffin on CBS College Sports

#602
#602
utgibbs said:
Who did you think would be our most likely opponent? I actually don't recall. At 6 - 6 I would have thought us bound for Weedwacker / Music City.
Click to expand...

Independence Bowl. Music City bowl was already locked up. We'd have likely played... Louisiana Tech. Against common opponents, the Bulldogs actually outperformed the Vols.
 
#603
#603
VKAman said:
Didn't you know that repeating something over and over counts as proof?
Click to expand...

Sort of like when the GoF cry:

Foul!

Link!

What data?!?

Says who!

That data is meaningless!

And yet, there is a TON of data right here right now showing not just numbers but ACTUAL NFL TALENT DISCREPANCY.

Oh, and the GoF NEVER have data.

GSM.
 
#604
#604
utgibbs said:
Sort of like when the GoF cry:

Foul!

Link!

What data?!?

Says who!

That data is meaningless!

And yet, there is a TON of data right here right now showing not just numbers but ACTUAL NFL TALENT DISCREPANCY.

Oh, and the GoF NEVER have data.

GSM.
Click to expand...

Data suggests that during Fulmer's indentured servitude to Steve Spurrier that he had more NFL talent than Steve, but an equal amount to Bobby Bowden, who regularly ate Steve's lunch.
 
#605
#605
kptvol said:
Independence Bowl. Music City bowl was already locked up. We'd have likely played... Louisiana Tech. Against common opponents, the Bulldogs actually outperformed the Vols.
Click to expand...

Damn, actually I would really, really, really liked to have seen that game, especially given where we are now.

Damn you, Hambone!

We would have won it, but it would have been interesting. Crompton though would have been a lot better by that game.
 
#606
#606
kptvol said:
Data suggests that during Fulmer's indentured servitude to Steve Spurrier that he had more NFL talent than Steve, but an equal amount to Bobby Bowden, who regularly ate Steve's lunch.
Click to expand...

We've been over this too.

The Florida - Tennessee version is false, and we've been over THAT ad infinitum this off-season.

I don't know about the Florida - FSU path though.
 
#607
#607
utgibbs said:
Damn, actually I would really, really, really liked to have seen that game, especially given where we are now.

Damn you, Hambone!

We would have won it, but it would have been interesting. Crompton though would have been a lot better by that game.
Click to expand...

According to Dave and Crompton, he wouldn't have been. We'd have lost. We barely beat NIU. We lost to Wyoming. Louisiana Tech would have wiped the field with us.
 
#608
#608
utgibbs said:
We've been over this too.

The Florida - Tennessee version is false, and we've been over THAT ad infinitum this off-season.

I don't know about the Florida - FSU path though.
Click to expand...

It is absolute fact that not too long ago UT and FSU were trading off #1 and #2 or tied for #1 for a good number of years.
 
#609
#609
GAVol said:
What are you talking about?

Everybody has stars. It's 5th-20th best players where the talent discrepancy happens.
Click to expand...

Data shows not only MORE NFL talent, but even greater RELATIVE NFL talent.

Sorry if the data upsets your ideology. But that's what data does to ideology.

By the way, that's 10 teams on the schedule now. However, I'll cut Kiff some slack and stick still go with the original 9.

Ergo, I'm erring on your side of the argument, and you still come up two wins short.
 
#610
#610
kptvol said:
It is absolute fact that not too long ago UT and FSU were trading off #1 and #2 or tied for #1 for a good number of years.
Click to expand...

No, this off-season we went through it, and Florida, even during the glory years, had more NFL players for longer in the league.

It is what it is.
 
#611
#611
utgibbs said:
Data shows not only MORE NFL talent, but even greater RELATIVE NFL talent.

Sorry if the data upsets your ideology. But that's what data does to ideology.

By the way, that's 10 teams on the schedule now. However, I'll cut Kiff some slack and stick still go with the original 9.

Ergo, I'm erring on your side of the argument, and you still come up two wins short.
Click to expand...

Supposing your idiotic theory is correct... So, suppose those teams continue to have 3-4 players drafted per year for the next four or five years and UT has little to none over that timespan?
 
#615
#615
utgibbs said:
Bob Stoops and Pete Carroll disagree! :peace2:
Click to expand...
No, they're laughing at the idea some fans are stupid enough to venerate a piece of trash who went a decade without winning a conference title.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#617
#617
utgibbs said:
UCLA - 35th, 104th, 219th

Auburn - 58th, 138th

Ole Miss - 36th, 85th, 136th, 175th

Tennessee - 5th, 26th, 59th, 129th, 151st, 168th

The single most meaningful statistic for college football success - NFL talent.

Boys, that's GSM.

Wipe your noses on a proper tissue, please.

2008 was underachieving by TN standards, of course. But without the Hambone Experiment, it would have been a bowl winning season.
Click to expand...

So we were the 4th most talented team in the nation? Texas, Tennessee and Utah were all playing with the same talent level last year? And all of them were more talented than Ohio State?
 
#621
#621
1999 Draft - 6 Vols taken
2010 Draft - 6 Vols taken

That settles it . . . The 2009 Vols were as talented as the 1998 Vols.
 
#623
#623
GAVol said:
1999 Draft - 6 Vols taken
2010 Draft - 6 Vols taken

That settles it . . . The 2009 Vols were as talented as the 1998 Vols.
Click to expand...

Clearly Fulmer would have won a National Championship had he come back. Game. Set. Match to Fulmer.
 
#624
#624
So, is anyone going to disprove my point:

We had equal or greater talent than nine teams we played last year.

Game... Set... well, you know the rest.
 
#625
#625
utgibbs said:
So, is anyone going to disprove my point:

We had equal or greater talent than nine teams we played last year.

Game... Set... well, you know the rest.
Click to expand...
How many teams with multiple walkons starting on the offensive line? How many teams did we play that would have been hurt by losing a no talent guy like Nick Reveiz? How many guys will UT have drafted in the next three years? I'm pretty sure the games were played with more than one class of players on the field. Of course, you don't want to get into that because it would expose the abject lack of talent the fat piece of garbage you worship left in his wake.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top