Fully admit I'm still trying to understand. Just looking for verifiable data.
As I understand it, the Adidas deal goes into the pool from which UT can share money with athletes up to the limits set by the House settlement. I'm other words, having that money does not increase the revenue share from UT to Lady Vols basketball. Still $900,000 for 2025-26.
Of course, according to the News Sentinel story, we have a staff administrator dedicated to helping connect athletes to 3rd-party NIL deals. But these have to be for actual value rendered and pass NCAA scrutiny, which estimates are that 70%+ of prior-year collective deals would have failed. This the sharp drop in collective money.
@KnoxLikeUs,I would love to know that UT has a lot of money it can hook athletes up with that cometes with UCLA, Texas , etc. As of yet, I haven't seen anything that seems like reliable confirmation of that. Of course, I have no inside sources. Just looking at publiclu available information.