I don't ever want to see Foster on the field again. If people can't see that Hardesty is a much better running back with better skills then I give up. I've been saying this about Hardesty for two years and everyone wants to take up for Foster. I think it was very apparant last night who needs to be carrying the ball for us. The difference in speed and aggressiveness between these two backs is not even close. Hardesty knows how to hit a hole and get to the endzone. On a couple of plays last night where Hardesty had big runs, I couldn't help but think that had Foster been in the game, he wouldn't have even gotten past the line of scrimmage because he would have been tackled from behind or at the line of scrimmage. The first offensive touchdown was a good example of why Hardesty needs to be carrying the ball. On that play, the backside linebacker for UCLA blitzed and was untouched on his way to Hardesty but Hardesty turned on the boosters and went through the defense without being touched until he hit paydirt. Foster would have been tackled by the blitzing linebacker and never would have gotten to the line of scrimmage. I know that people have to be seeing this and can't believe this change has taken this long. If you are a slow and I mean very slow running back in the SEC, you sit on the bench or get faster. Dancing around in the backfield does nothing but give the defense time to get you behind the line of scrimmage when you play our schedule. Maybe Fulmer will abandon his UNION like ways and let the underclassman carry the load.