First time since 1988 Vols vs Bama won't be nationally televised.

[kiddiedoc]

Kentucky actually has a chance to be as good or better next year. Curtis Pulley will be back for his JR. season. He´s the shifty QB that gave you guys fits 2 years ago, and actually beat out Woodson for the QB job in Spring of 2006.

Yadda, yadda. . . .but you'll still be "Kentucky." So, enjoy 2007.

 

[lacrossepro70]

I've said it once and I'll say it again. The rise of Kentucky is a bad bad thing. Luckily they'll be back next year. Back to crap that is.

 

[McCat]

OK, if you guys think that Kentucky´s rise is just due to Woodson, keep on thinking that. :dry:

 

[ukvols]

OK, if you guys think that Kentucky´s rise is just due to Woodson, keep on thinking that. :dry:

My guess is that many of us don't think that. While on the subject of KY's rise, I expected a schedule with the heavyweights at home and the "winnable" games on the road to be a detriment. It has turned into an advantage. Still, until the overall talent level matches the perennial top teams in the SEC, it will continue to take the team playing above its shoulders for the winning to continue. They remind me of Pearl's first team. They got on a roll and played above their heads all year before running out of steam late in the season.

 

[vol1981]

Uhhhh, just wondering. Does the fact that UT beat an overrated GA team mean that the Vols will now dominate the SEC-E?

:ermm:

 

[PowerT83]

Uhhhh, just wondering. Does the fact that UT beat an overrated GA team mean that the Vols will now dominate the SEC-E?

:ermm:

Counts on who you ask. If we can run the ball without getting the butter fingers I think we can win out....i dont know about dominate.