Ferguson Riots

You do know you can be in the bottom 90% and make 90-140K a year..just saying..

If I married a chick with a "decent" income I'd be a 10%er..and I'm not driving a Lambo or snorking coke of hookers on my yatch..

Not yet but isn't that the ultimate goal. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Im guessing here, but I'm willing to bet these LE agencies were either too cheap or their leadership was afraid of the ACLU in regards to Tasers. Not saying either would still be alive, but I'd bet these officers wouldve liked to have that tool on their belt. No telling how many lives have been saved with these little electric pulses of love.
 
On the video it appears he walks out the front door and when the manager/owner confronts him, he then walks back inside and grabs him and strong arms him.

Given that he did this in the store when told to stop, it could make since that when he was walking away the cop said stop also and he did the same thing....turned around and came back ready to strong arm him.

This is when the office went into defense mode and began shooting.

I wasn't there...but this seems plausible.
 
Holder doesnt agree with how FPD released info. Color me shocked.


That's because the police have managed this about as poorly as one can imagine.

There's a curfew. Nope, wait, there's no curfew. We will release the name tomorrow. Wait, no, we will wait a bit. You can march, but not stand still. No marching. How many different law enforcement agencies have been in charge so far, or at least been given some command duties?

Whoever is making the main decisions appears to be extremely impulsive and impatient.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
For anyone that might have missed it. Vice News was standing near officers along with other reporters and photographers and someone in the protesting crowd started firing live shots at police. Swat in full body armor had to rush in and escort them out of danger.

On this video link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmqHVKNZkhM @2:45:00 2 hours 45 minutes in.

You can hear rapid succession fire in the background.
 
Last edited:
Okay military/LEO guys I need you're help. I've gotten hounded by people on Twitter for saying LEOs/Mil guys are not trained to shoot to wound but to shoot to kill and keep shooting until the threat is ended? Is that not true? They are saying that firing until the threat is ended is bad training.
 
Okay military/LEO guys I need you're help. I've gotten hounded by people on Twitter for saying LEOs/Mil guys are not trained to shoot to wound but to shoot to kill and keep shooting until the threat is ended? Is that not true? They are saying that firing until the threat is ended is bad training.

When anyone: law Enforcement, military, or civilian begins to use a firearm for defense, lethal force is the goal.
 
Okay military/LEO guys I need you're help. I've gotten hounded by people on Twitter for saying LEOs/Mil guys are not trained to shoot to wound but to shoot to kill and keep shooting until the threat is ended? Is that not true? They are saying that firing until the threat is ended is bad training.


You are right, they are idiots.

Well, you are an idiot, too, but in this case you got lucky.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Okay military/LEO guys I need you're help. I've gotten hounded by people on Twitter for saying LEOs/Mil guys are not trained to shoot to wound but to shoot to kill and keep shooting until the threat is ended? Is that not true? They are saying that firing until the threat is ended is bad training.

Just like daddy taught me squirrel hunting after he got me a custom 4-10 for my 6th birthday, "don't point this at anything you don't intend to kill". Shooting to "wound" is tv garbage.
 
If you hit a man in the thigh, there's a good chance he will bleed out. If you aim for his shoulder, the top of the lung extends to the clavicle.
 
Okay military/LEO guys I need you're help. I've gotten hounded by people on Twitter for saying LEOs/Mil guys are not trained to shoot to wound but to shoot to kill and keep shooting until the threat is ended? Is that not true? They are saying that firing until the threat is ended is bad training.

You happen to be correct.
 
That's because the police have managed this about as poorly as one can imagine.

There's a curfew. Nope, wait, there's no curfew. We will release the name tomorrow. Wait, no, we will wait a bit. You can march, but not stand still. No marching. How many different law enforcement agencies have been in charge so far, or at least been given some command duties?

Whoever is making the main decisions appears to be extremely impulsive and impatient.

It's because they're being micromanaged by the idiot racist president.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

Advertisement



Back
Top