FBI Thread

#701
#701
BowlBrother85 said:
"we" ????

I would have never guessed that you were a political partisan, without such an astonishing reveal. LOL.

... and these guys are not "whistleblowers." They are disgruntled former employees, with a bad case of sour grapes.
Click to expand...

Why should we take your word for it? You were entirely wrong abut Crossfire Hurricane.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vols40, OrangeBoro, AM64 and 4 others
#703
#703
Orangeburst said:
Why should we take your word for it? You were entirely wrong abut Crossfire Hurricane.
Click to expand...
You don't have to take my word for a damn thing!

All I'm saying is that the tweet misrepresented the contents of The New York Times article which was linked. The point of that linked New York Times article, was to explain how the Trump Administration had weaponized the Department of Justice during Trump's term in office. Trump pressured the FBI to investigate the Clinton Foundation throughout his time in office, but no charges were ever filed.

Read the damn article, and decide for yourself if I'm correct in that assessment.
 
#704
#704
BowlBrother85 said:
You don't have to take my word for a damn thing!

All I'm saying is that the tweet misrepresented the contents of The New York Times article which was linked. The point of that linked New York Times article, was to explain how the Trump Administration had weaponized the Department of Justice during Trump's term in office. Trump pressured the FBI to investigate the Clinton Foundation throughout his time in office, but no charges were ever filed.

Read the damn article, and decide for yourself if I'm correct in that assessment.
Click to expand...

The NYT lies. I don't GAS what they have to say. Their credibility is worthless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OrangeBoro, AM64, norrislakevol and 1 other person
#706
#706
BowlBrother85 said:
Then why did the guy sending that tweet link an article to The New York Times?

@W.TN.Orange Blood ,

You should read The New York Times article which was linked in that tweet you posted. It does not say what you evidently think it does. You were duped by a tweet.
Click to expand...

You think the Clinton Foundation isn't corrupt?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and InVOLuntary
#711
#711
BowlBrother85 said:
You are too quick to accept that guy's interpretation. Read The New York Times article which was linked.
Click to expand...
BowlBrother85 said:
You are too quick to accept that guy's interpretation. Read The New York Times article which was linked.
Click to expand...

Is it SOP for the FBI to destroy collected evidence in cases where no charges are brought?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#712
#712
hog88 said:
Is it SOP for the FBI to destroy collected evidence in cases where no charges are brought?
Click to expand...
I have no idea ...

... but that last line was nothing but an afterthought in that New York Times article. The article's clear purpose was to allege that the Trump Administration had weaponized the Department of Justice against his political rivals, including Hillary Clinton.

It was ridiculous for that tweet, to include a link to that article.
 
#714
#714
McCarthy Expects FBI To Share File On Biden Bribery Allegations | The Daily Wire

GettyImages-1491018597-scaled-e1684689064121.jpg

Everything is redacted face.
 
#720
#720
AM64 said:
Did Rudy have a real position of authority in the Trump administration ... other than court jester? The guy was a blathering idiot who should have been put in a home years ago.
Click to expand...
All I know is whatever he was sweating out of his pores wasn't normal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#721
#721
hog88 said:
Is it SOP for the FBI to destroy collected evidence in cases where no charges are brought?
Click to expand...

Destroying records makes it so much easier to claim "It was all done by the books; we found nothing ... absolutely nothing; so the records were destroyed." Which is a bit odd since Kennedy assassination files are still apparently around and some parts still classified. I'd pretty much bet that if the FBI has ever destroyed files or evidence, it's to protect the FBI ... wouldn't want that integrity thing challenged.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top