Or hes got enough to worry about in other areas and these two cases are a distraction. The McClatchy article is just more partisan speculation. Even the sources offered no validation why the trip might have occurred.
Obama had a 62% approval rating from right-leaning Rasmussen when he left office. Seems most of America disagrees with you and your ilk.
Michael Cohen bought a condo in the upper east side of NYC in 2016 for $58 million. He is obviously very wealthy. So why did he need to take out a HELOC to pay Stormy Daniels the $130K?
So the story now changes? Can you please pick a consistent argument where rules apply to both sides, not just one.
Where am I being inconsistent? Trump ain't paying Cohen a salary sufficient to afford a $58 million condo. If he's doing that, it's likely with someone else's cash as part of a money laundering scheme.
Just Google Michael Cohen money laundering. McClatchy did a piece on him last year on this very subject.
Where am I being inconsistent? Trump ain't paying Cohen a salary sufficient to afford a $58 million condo. If he's doing that, it's likely with someone else's cash as part of a money laundering scheme.
Just Google Michael Cohen money laundering. McClatchy did a piece on him last year on this very subject.
Where am I being inconsistent? Trump ain't paying Cohen a salary sufficient to afford a $58 million condo. If he's doing that, it's likely with someone else's cash as part of a money laundering scheme.
Just Google Michael Cohen money laundering. McClatchy did a piece on him last year on this very subject.
More excrement flung towards the wall. I wish I had started a list of all these idiotic predictions starting back when Trump was first elected.
Your opinions form around partisan slant. Cohen's a Republican, must be a money launderer. I asked if the same would apply to a Dem, you back peddle. Apply the same logic to people regardless of partisanship. All of your assumptions, and let's face it, they are assumptions, revolve around his political affiliation.