Fbi raids trump lawyer

#551
#551
Squints said:
Not impressed.

Listen, you came in here guns-a-blazin’ with woefully inept tangents. You act cretinous, you’ll be treated as such.

As for cheating, your intellectual deficiencies in no way affect my accomplishments. It’s a weak ass argument and only further exemplifies your ignorance about the testing process.

Now, answer the questions that have been asked of you.
Click to expand...

Who wrote this for you? LOL

Go back to your tweezers. Another 3000 strokes on little richard and you will have made the complete tranistion to Oriental
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#552
#552
PointGuard said:
I would label your definition of liberalism as more towards socialism. Whether it is liberalism or socialism I conclude you don't like the concept.

What you think public education is then?. Do you have kids in a public school? Do you own your own home? If yes to both those questions and you pay less than $13,000 per child in Real Estate taxes then per your definition you are living off liberalism or socialism per my definition.
Click to expand...

Liberalism, socialism, and communism are birds of a feather - just varying degrees of state control.

You can choose to "benefit" from public education - or not, but you will pay for it either way. Unfortunately it has significantly degenerated from the time when you and I were in school, so perhaps letting government run education isn't such a wonderful idea.

By the way you know you pay educational taxes as long as you are alive and kicking - regardless of how many years ago your kids quit using it - and without regard to how many kids in your family participated. People who choose or can't have kids really get the short end of the stick. Then there's the issue that when people don't pay directly for something they don't tend to appreciate it.
 
#554
#554
1972 Grad said:
I have never had a child, and own 3 homes, so I'm doing my part.
Click to expand...

Royally screwed I'd say. It wouldn't be so bad if the product was good because we do all benefit from a well educated society. Unfortunately governments at all levels can't get the quality part right, but they can certainly waste and mismanage our money like a champ.
 
#556
#556
NorthDallas40 said:
Careful about too much chest pounding your old dumbass might crack a rib or two.

Now stop dodging the damn question. How is the building not compliant with the fire code? Even the Clinton News Network already debunked this. The building was compliant with the applicable codes and, if major renovations are made, the fire chief will require installation of sprinkler systems.

Btw Trump did on his own decision install sprinklers in the 350 residential apartments in Trump World Tower at his own pocket cost of $3M

So you’re wrong! It doesn’t freaking need to be determined what codes apply it’s been determined and the building complies!!
Click to expand...

I'm not dodging anything.

I'm tempted to tell you to ****-off. I'll answer your question when you answer those you never addressed in the Laura Ingraham thread.

Instead - Sprinkler legislation was called for by Guiliani in the late 90's as a result of the “Macaulay Culkin fire” and Guiliani’s push for sprinkler regulations" Go ahead and Google it you guys seem to know nothing except from Goohling

Before you reply though please extend the courtesy of replying to my previously unanswered questions.
 
#557
#557
AM64 said:
Royally screwed I'd say. It wouldn't be so bad if the product was good because we do all benefit from a well educated society. Unfortunately governments at all levels can't get the quality part right, but they can certainly waste and mismanage our money like a champ.
Click to expand...

We don’t have kids either but I dont mind paying. But since I don’t get the benefit you’d be surprised how nosy I am on school finance!!

I’ll gladly pay. But don’t blow it on crack and hoes.
 
#558
#558
PointGuard said:
I'm not dodging anything.

I'm tempted to tell you to ****-off. I'll answer your question when you answer those you never addressed in the Laura Ingraham thread.

Instead - Sprinkler legislation was called for by Guiliani in the late 90's as a result of the “Macaulay Culkin fire” and Guiliani’s push for sprinkler regulations" Go ahead and Google it you guys seem to know nothing except from Goohling

Before you reply though please extend the courtesy of replying to my previously unanswered questions.
Click to expand...

Go ahead and tell me the f-off I’ll gladly return it in kind. And I can’t think of a single question your incoherent old ass has asked me that was interpretable that I didn’t answer.
 
#559
#559
PointGuard said:
It is criminal that only one banker went to jail as a result of the economic collapse of 2007-2008.

Obama had no choice but to stave off worldwide economic collapse. The ripple effect that was began with the collapse of Lehman Brothers contributed.

Only the uninformed (no crime in that) fail to acknowledge that world wide catastrophe was averted.

Our country's economic problems have been kicked down the road by every President really beginning in earnest before Clinton although Clinton was the only President who ran a balanced budget.

Unfortunately for George W. the ship hit the fan during his second term. Sooner or later the piper has to be paid. While W contributed to the mess with his deficit impacted tax cuts, the bigger culprit was something something W could not control - - credit default swaps. They dried up the money flow and 1929--1932 was about to repeat.

I guess you have reading comprehension. I am a registered Republican.
Click to expand...

Hmmm, apparently I missed that, but I sure thought I saw something about support for liberalism, though. Anyway ...

Propping up banks might have been in our best interest, but I'm not fully convinced. What I am convinced of is that there should have been a row of very busy guillotines on Wall St - just to make damn sure they don't do it again.

The sad part is that with the complicity of both parties in congress, they will do it again. It's amazing that with lifetime members of congress they never learn anything, so we get to see all the bad parts happen over and over again. It's like BJ football, snap and forget.
 
#561
#561
This Russian that donated $100,000 to Trump apparently donated around 25 million to the Clinton Foundation. The fix is in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#562
#562
PointGuard said:
I'm not dodging anything.

I'm tempted to tell you to ****-off. I'll answer your question when you answer those you never addressed in the Laura Ingraham thread.

Instead - Sprinkler legislation was called for by Guiliani in the late 90's as a result of the “Macaulay Culkin fire” and Guiliani’s push for sprinkler regulations" Go ahead and Google it you guys seem to know nothing except from Goohling

Before you reply though please extend the courtesy of replying to my previously unanswered questions.
Click to expand...

Wasn’t Trump tower built in the 70s or 80s?
 
#563
#563
AirVol said:
$$
Click to expand...

Safer to go after a lawyer than a mentally unstable kid with guns?

Think about all the man hours the FBI spent going after mafia types before managing to nail some on really big stuff like tax evasion, jury tampering, and mail fraud. Seems like their biggest breakthroughs came not on investigatory skill but on turning one against another.
 
#566
#566
volfanhill said:
Late 70’s and was built to code. NY then grandfathered in a bunch of high rises later on.
Click to expand...

In 1999 NYC passed code requiring sprinklers in all residential spaces over so many units don’t remember the number. Trump World Tower was started in 1999 but permits were issued earlier thus it was compliant when approved. Trump later, on his own action, installed sprinklers in the residential spaces in Trump World Tower. He was not forced to do so anywhere I can find. Trump Tower was built much earlier.
 
#569
#569
Vol_Doc said:
What part of the constitution is violated? Just curious.
Click to expand...

Fourth Amendment prohibits 'unreasonable' searches and seizures by the government – a description that could apply to scooping up communications between a lawyer and his client, except in extreme circumstances.

Sixth Amendment guarantees Americans the right to 'the assistance of counsel' for courtroom defense, meaning no government can interfere with that relationship.

Dershowitz says that 'if the government improperly seizes private or privileged material, the violation has already occurred, even if the government never uses them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#570
#570
AM64 said:
Royally screwed I'd say. It wouldn't be so bad if the product was good because we do all benefit from a well educated society. Unfortunately governments at all levels can't get the quality part right, but they can certainly waste and mismanage our money like a champ.
Click to expand...

Guys, public education is not as bad as it is made out to be.

Nothing much can be done for kids with no motivation or outside support, but valiant efforts are being made by a lot
of good and dedicated people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#572
#572
luthervol said:
I think he's horrible. He was a horrible pick for vice-pres. I probably agree more with Trump's policies than with Pence's.

BUT Pence isn't such a repugnant individual and national embarrassment. Plus, I believe Pence would cause much less long term damage.
Click to expand...

How many days until the impeachment proceedings begin against Pence?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#574
#574
I need a refresher. Can someone remind me what crimes Mueller is investigating, the criminal statutes and the legal case precedence(s) ?

Can’t recall who said it, but Mueller is comparable to the Stalinist spy chief, Lavrentiy Beria who said: ‘Show Me the Man, and I’ll Show You the Crime’
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#575
#575
luthervol said:
Guys, public education is not as bad as it is made out to be.

Nothing much can be done for kids with no motivation or outside support, but valiant efforts are being made by a lot
of good and dedicated people.
Click to expand...

What is missing is the snap - the ability to do something for the more capable and the exceptional kids. It's why we don't compete well at the higher end with even countries like India. We are too caught up in showing no favoritism - except to the challenged - to spend what it takes to prepare the best.

My complaint isn't so much with teachers as "educators" and politicians who decide policy and what and how to teach. I have a son who taught at the university level, and decided from what he saw of incoming students that he could do more at the HS level. He could but he couldn't, and after that head banging experience he's back at a university.

The school system here was contemplating hiring foreign teachers because of the difficulty in finding quality math and science teachers. It's a real condemnation of a system that cannot self sustain. In my day there was tracking - courses geared to student ability; of course, that's not PC now. We'll waste money all day long on those students (and parents) who won't even do the minimum, but not a cent in tribute to those who will make our future.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top