BenGrimm
Formally known as burntorangeVOLffle
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2008
- Messages
- 16,164
- Likes
- 10,267
The late new "rule" for fake injuries may or may not have an impact... I suspect it wont have much an impact.... People saying Heupal has to have an answer for fake injuries and make adjustments... What can you do???
Its very easy to see those faking injury because of the way they call the play. 99% of the time its a guy standing up, the play is called, and then he falls to the ground in pain. If they stay on the ground when the whistle blows they are injured if they fall down later they need to sit out a while. Anyone can spot it.Won’t work. Good idea. A neutral trainer can not tell if I am faking it.
I definitely agree with the team only being allowed to sub for the player that’s injured. They should not allow the team to completely change their defense.It’s my understanding the NCAA have expressed their disapproval of faking injuries and are trying to figure out the best way to address the issue without jeopardizing the safety of the players.
Right now it’s all after the fact, turn in footage of fakers and they get in trouble with the NCAA, process. I get it. They know it’s a problem so blatantly faking injuries to make a point isn’t going to be answer and actually could get JH in “trouble”.
I would like to see a montage of obvious fakes on the the video boards to start the 2nd and 4th quarters.
A rule change that a team can only sub for the players that are injured, unless a TO is called or the other team decides to sub too.
This doesn’t address the in game implications of fake injuries completely, but it’s a start that won’t jeopardize the players’ safety.
I was fortunate enough to attend a game last year and one of our guys keep getting hurt on the PAT. After the game an opposing fan made the comment that our guys had too many cookies to eat before the game. After I explained to him that faking an injury going into a tv timeout isn’t how it works, but after 2nd down is the best time to fake and injury since the injury TO gives the team a chance to sub for fresh players, giving the coaches a chance to go over strategy and disrupt the rhythm of the offense.
I think we will see better acting this year.
These people are way to greedy to let go of the kind of money it would take to implement that.How about a mandate of only NCAA-appointed, neutral medical and training staffs, present for game situations only? This would allow the schools to still utilize trainers and medical staff during practices and scrimmages but take out some of the potential bias of a trainer or medic present from the other team to observe and still have the “injured player” fake the injury in the tent.
Likely a pipe dream, but I don’t see how this option could be bad if they really want to enact a change yet still not penalize offenses by stopping the pace/flow of a game for substitutions all the time.
Is too logical… maybe too expensive.. an MD worth a damn is not going to be influenced by the coach, one would hope.. plus there are Stark/ anti-kickback laws in place.. if I were the NCAA… I might look into that one.. Players health should be paramount above all elseHow about a mandate of only NCAA-appointed, neutral medical and training staffs, present for game situations only? This would allow the schools to still utilize trainers and medical staff during practices and scrimmages but take out some of the potential bias of a trainer or medic present from the other team to observe and still have the “injured player” fake the injury in the tent.
Likely a pipe dream, but I don’t see how this option could be bad if they really want to enact a change yet still not penalize offenses by stopping the pace/flow of a game for substitutions all the time.
The late new "rule" for fake injuries may or may not have an impact... I suspect it wont have much an impact.... People saying Heupal has to have an answer for fake injuries and make adjustments... What can you do???
Is too logicalHow about a mandate of only NCAA-appointed, neutral medical and training staffs, present for game situations only? This would allow the schools to still utilize trainers and medical staff during practices and scrimmages but take out some of the potential bias of a trainer or medic present from the other team to observe and still have the “injured player” fake the injury in the tent.
Likely a pipe dream, but I don’t see how this option could be bad if they really want to enact a change yet still not penalize offenses by stopping the pace/flow of a game for substitutions all the time.
If the NCAA higher ups were smart, which they aren’t.. they would make them sit if they truly cared about the health and safety of the players.. that is more important than how much time they play.. that’s not what they care aboutNCAA refuses to do anything that looks punitive to floppers, lest it encourage a player to stay in the game to avoid hurting his teams chances. The irony of that is that when Hooker had a no-doubter injury and had to go,out, it cost TN 10 seconds of valuable clock time. It probably cost us a play, at least made us run a more desperate play. Why does this work for the offense, but not the defense?
I think should be a rule that MDs override’trainers’ (I’m not sure their credentials).. as a nurse, I can’t override the doctor, I can voice my concerns, but I can’t go rogue lolNothing you can do because a trainer is always going to take any injury serious. That being said there’s not a trainer alive that’s going to go against the HC if he says to “buy us some time”.
Those are the ones that should be put up on the Jumbotron. I expect the coaches that will use fake injuries for extra timeouts will have their players be a little more discreet when faking.Its very easy to see those faking injury because of the way they call the play. 99% of the time its a guy standing up, the play is called, and then he falls to the ground in pain. If they stay on the ground when the whistle blows they are injured if they fall down later they need to sit out a while. Anyone can spot it.
The late new "rule" for fake injuries may or may not have an impact... I suspect it wont have much an impact.... People saying Heupal has to have an answer for fake injuries and make adjustments... What can you do???
Absolutely.. if you are legit hurt or cramping you don’t spring up then fall down lol unless you had syncope..then you really need to sit out lolIts very easy to see those faking injury because of the way they call the play. 99% of the time its a guy standing up, the play is called, and then he falls to the ground in pain. If they stay on the ground when the whistle blows they are injured if they fall down later they need to sit out a while. Anyone can spot it.
Its very easy to see those faking injury because of the way they call the play. 99% of the time its a guy standing up, the play is called, and then he falls to the ground in pain. If they stay on the ground when the whistle blows they are injured if they fall down later they need to sit out a while. Anyone can spot it.
Agree in principle, but you can't put the officials in the health analysis or drama judging role real time.
As I posted in other thread (short version), any player that requires an injury timeout gets 5 clock minutes with his own medical team before he is eligible for reentry. Offense or defense. And for sure he is the only player on that team that can be substituted. I think it is better if the other team gets to respond with one sub also. This eliminates a defense from correcting alignment issues and going to a nickle package, or back and only losing the guy they wanted off the field anyway.
Offense is less of a problem, because if they sub one guy the defense is allowed to respond, but the rule should be inclusive. The flip side could become clock saving by going down, to avoid a play clock violation or just stopping the game clock. Maybe have a special rule for the QB if he goes down due to contact and does not just fall down.
Then just make it a penalty judgement call by the ref. The point is to make them stop, once stopped it will no longer be an issue.
That concept might last till the first guy is penalized and then has a fracture confirmed following the game. Time and timeouts to avoid time is the only practical way I can see. Maybe a down rollback if on defense or loss of down on offense, but don't see that flying either. No judgement required if they stop the clock for an injury. Just follow the procedure.
Make this a small deal. The ref can easily see the player looking to the sideline and getting the signal. You don't need to penalize them all, just the obvious ones to start. Once coaches see the conference is serious they will stop. Put the problem back on the coaches. No one will be on their side, even their own fans.
Nothing will be done about it until some team does it vs Alabama and Saban complains about it.