Ewwwwww, Penn State at it Again

#101
#101
VolStrom said:
What do these Chemical Engineering guys conjure up in the labs? I had a TA in one of my freshman chemistry classes that apparently never took a shower. He had shoulder length hair that was dripping grease, and you dare not ask him a question because his BO would knock you down within 10 feet.
Click to expand...
I know you’re from an earlier time (like me) but that sounds disgusting even today.
 
#114
#114
Sgt_Nick_Fury said:
Putting this in political forum instead of sports, because the article clearly goes that way. But seriously given the number of incidents what the heck is up with Penn State? Why do they seem to have the most freaks on Admin and staff?

Confirmed: Penn State Professor and Dog Lover Accused of Bestiality is a Longtime Liberal Who Donated to Liz Warren, Hillary Clinton, and John Kerry | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft | 120
Click to expand...
Apologies didn't see the other thread.
 
#119
#119
McDad said:
As far as I am aware, there is only two irrefutable lines. One is consent. The other is a violation of rights.

Are we to assign ability to consent to non humans?

Do animals enjoy the same rights as humans?
Click to expand...

Consent applies to animals. In the case of a dog, I would think one woof means yes, two woofs mean no.

Now leave your goats alone.
 
#123
#123
Sudden Impact said:
I would have never thought that after eating a Steak that I would have to clarify a statement "That was a good piece of meat" meant after it was cooked. Or a butcher might take offense if asked "How good is that Meat". To someone surprise the Butcher might answer not sure I only had sex with that cow one time you might have to ask Joe in the back.

Instead of a Dog, why didn't he just get a goat.
Click to expand...
Are you insinuating that goats are of low morals?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83, AM64 and McDad
#124
#124
85SugarVol said:
@McDad
you remember our conversation about Hog’s dead corpse and whether his wife was harmed by actions perpetrated on it?

I believe it was in the greater context of kink vs crime - where does one end and the other begin?
Click to expand...

We should sticky this post. Then we wouldn’t need the 250 post requirement. This alone will scare off the masses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#125
#125
evillawyer said:
I think he's being serious and thinks the left is actually ok with this.
Click to expand...

Seems to me he was making fun of the left - probably both sides of the political spectrum in fact. The left for liking stuff that gets them votes - dogs obviously can't vote, but any other type of sexual deviancy is apparently acceptable to them ... as long as it is "consensual". On the other side of the political spectrum he's saying folks are too straight (publicly) to agree with anything that doesn't have "missionary" attached ... and probably not even then if the lights are on.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top