Even More Obamacare Follies

Resorting to ad-hominem attacks proves that you have gotten you're sorrow butt handed too you.

You know, there are still some countries out there proclaiming to be "worker's paradises."

Cuba and North Korea would be more than happy to plus their population by one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
The facts, jack:

1) The UE rate in russia was 0%. They found work for everyone.

2) There were no homeless people

3) The price system was planned in a way that ensured that nobody would be priced out of anything.

Facts?

Would you trade living in 50s to 80s Soviet Union for living in the USA?
 
I know you're trolling on purpose but I am curious. You have been asked to provide evidence to reinforce your claims and you have provided none. Why is that?
Because we are talking theoretical economics. I firmly believe a more just economic system is possible, where poor people don't have to live a life separate from goods and services.
 
I thought some of LG's posts were off the wall, but this guy takes the cake.

We really do need to get him and VM in a thread together and just sit back and watch.
 
Because we are talking theoretical economics. I firmly believe a more just economic system is possible, where poor people don't have to live a life separate from goods and services.

I guess companies in the US would just produce & export & the companies that already left in large part based on your principles would just sell their product in the country they relocated to. There wouldn't be many companies wanting to export to the US that's for sure.
 
I thought some of LG's posts were off the wall, but this guy takes the cake.

We really do need to get him and VM in a thread together and just sit back and watch.

I'm thinking Volomon (or something like that) should be in there. He usually posted after football games and what must be large amounts of Jack. Stuff like "kiddicker" instead of kicker
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Doesn't matter that the prices are equal. Poor don't have discretionary income.

This coming from a guy who's nickname represents a scalping murderer. A murder of Indians, women and children. (possibly fictional)

We are being trolled my friends.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
The facts, jack:

1) The UE rate in russia was 0%. They found work for everyone.

2) There were no homeless people

3) The price system was planned in a way that ensured that nobody would be priced out of anything.

1) Being in a Stalag does not constitute employment.

2) They were told where they could live, couldn't own property

3) They had stores that the common worker was barred from entering
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
this guy is funny. I'm leaning 95% troll only because there are people who believe this way. Most are smart enough to keep it private but they do exist

Boris Yeltsin after a visit to a US grocery store:
“When I saw those shelves crammed with hundreds, thousands of cans, cartons and goods of every possible sort, I felt quite frankly sick with despair for the Soviet people.”
“They had to fool the people,” he told Sukhanov. “It is now clear why they made it so difficult for the average Soviet citizen to go abroad. They were afraid that people’s eyes would open.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Resorting to ad-hominem attacks proves that you have gotten you're sorrow butt handed too you.

Oh, I didn't know we were even debating. You see, if we were debating, you would have provided reference to your stats when asked to do so, and responded to the points I've made that undermined your argument. But you haven't.

Therefor, the ad hominem was merely there for humor's sake and to fill the void you left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Because we are talking theoretical economics. I firmly believe a more just economic system is possible, where poor people don't have to live a life separate from goods and services.

Statistics are not 'theoretical'. You use them (make them up), and then refuse to support them when asked to do so.

In your 'theory', you refuse to submit to facts presented that undermine your theory. Thus, it's not even theory, it is the ideal of a person who has not worked in five years, trying to tell everyone else they deserve what the workers get.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
And rationed it to the lower workers. There at times were major food shortages in the former USSR, the political elite never went hungry.

And there in lies the problem. The top echelon of "rulers, leaders, and representatives" lived like kings while the masses suffered.

What was good for the majority wasn't good for them. Kind of similar to our current "leaders and representatives".

Hypocrites and selfish/self serving, corrupted, vanity seeking, greed filled pos are what we currently have for the majority in DC. History repeating itself, except it isn't supposed to happen here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Advertisement

Back
Top