Epstein List

there was a lottery won that was picked up by a Zorro employee.

And your source for that is the email or do you have something else?

its redacted so its impossible to really tell but this particular email seems more like its part of an investigation rather than a report on some rando saying there were baby eating black people. There was some level of homework done by whoever sent this email. The baby eating email had very little/no follow up.

not saying its conclusive, but its multiple steps more believable than the spaghetti monster in the sky you want it to be.

We need a lot more than an email before coming in with your overly dramatic “so the whole Epstein thing is fabricated”. There may be more to this. But we need more than a random email
 
Same person who said we shouldn’t refer to his victims as children and that it was over sensationalism

Lmfao you’re mocking me for the sin of wanting more than a random email before believing your lottery conspiracy?
 
there was a lottery won that was picked up by a Zorro employee.

its redacted so its impossible to really tell but this particular email seems more like its part of an investigation rather than a report on some rando saying there were baby eating black people. There was some level of homework done by whoever sent this email. The baby eating email had very little/no follow up.

not saying its conclusive, but its multiple steps more believable than the spaghetti monster in the sky you want it to be.
Never doubt the spaghetti monster in the sky. It's terrifying.
 
Lmfao you’re mocking me for the sin of wanting more than a random email before believing your lottery conspiracy?
Asking questions is never a bad thing. Being a hypocrite and lying are sins though. Yes I’ll continue to bring up your dismissal of Epstein raping children oh and the fact you proudly claimed there was absolutely nothing in the files (even though you said you didn’t read a single one)

My conspiracy? I don’t care much about it, I care far more about the feds never stepping foot on Zorro ranch when it was in multiple testimonies. The possible lotto is just a side piece to that.
 
Asking questions is never a bad thing. Being a hypocrite and lying are sins though. Yes I’ll continue to bring up your dismissal of Epstein raping children oh and the fact you proudly claimed there was absolutely nothing in the files (even though you said you didn’t read a single one)

My conspiracy? I don’t care much about it, I care far more about the feds never stepping foot on Zorro ranch when it was in multiple testimonies. The possible lotto is just a side piece to that.

Lmfao lying hypocrite. That’s adorable. How dare I expect more than a random email as evidence
 
And your source for that is the email or do you have something else?



We need a lot more than an email before coming in with your overly dramatic “so the whole Epstein thing is fabricated”. There may be more to this. But we need more than a random email
source for there being a winning lottery for the specified amount? it was in some of the links I am pretty sure you posted clearing up the issue about the "re" drawing of said lottery, now you are questioning that there was even a lottery after establishing it yourself? you are being too much of a contrarian you aren't even keeping up with your own points. pretty sure the same sources, I can't remember if I read it in your links or some others tbh, mentioned a Zorro Trust employee did pick it up.

why do a bunch of randos on the internet "need" more of anything to continue a conversation? as far as I have seen we haven't condemned anyone but Epstein for any of these acts.

you can just point out that the link between the two possible Zorros has not been established, and leave it at that. but you are taking it to a different level than just wanting to get the facts straight.
 
Your misrepresentation of the point (as usual) is noted

Lmao my misrepresentation? Look at what you responded to. ND40 was mocking me for the sin of wanting more than a random email as evidence.

Please show where I’ve lied. I’ll wait?
 
source for there being a winning lottery for the specified amount? it was in some of the links I am pretty sure you posted clearing up the issue about the "re" drawing of said lottery, now you are questioning that there was even a lottery after establishing it yourself? you are being too much of a contrarian you aren't even keeping up with your own points. pretty sure the same sources, I can't remember if I read it in your links or some others tbh, mentioned a Zorro Trust employee did pick it up.

I don’t think I’m too much of a contrarian at all. I think you should expect actual evidence. No, I’m not claiming there was no winning lottery by Zorro Trust. I’m very openly saying all available evidence shows it was woman by a local woman and not by Epstein. I’m also saying there’s no evidence these are the same entity. For example if you own a business in Oklahoma “Louders PR Firm”, there may be numerous of those throughout the country.

The claims that it was the same man working for Epstein’s Zorro Trust who picked up the man all seem to be fabricated without any evidence

why do a bunch of randos on the internet "need" more of anything to continue a conversation? as far as I have seen we haven't condemned anyone but Epstein for any of these acts.

Converse all you wish. But don’t come at me pretending I’m dismissing the entire Epstein case (a real thing you claimed) just because I don’t believe he won the lottery.

you can just point out that the link between the two possible Zorros has not been established, and leave it at that. but you are taking it to a different level than just wanting to get the facts straight.

How? I’ve merely pointed out that everything beyond the name being the same seems fabricated.
 
Lmao my misrepresentation? Look at what you responded to. ND40 was mocking me for the sin of wanting more than a random email as evidence.

Please show where I’ve lied. I’ll wait?
read back to previous convos in the other Epstein thread. Not going to blow up another thread for pointless back and forth
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
And your source for that is the email or do you have something else?



We need a lot more than an email before coming in with your overly dramatic “so the whole Epstein thing is fabricated”. There may be more to this. But we need more than a random email
I disagree. You are at your privilege to doubt their source. But now you have to provide a source to refute. I don't know how you do that but if the Zorros are not connected there should be some evidence especially considering this isn't new news.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smokey123
How? The email is someone claiming the two are linked. But it in no way verifies it. Rather it seems to be the source of the claim.
I don't know who Conchita is but there is a statement of the link in an email where other statements have also been shown to be accurate.

Would have to assume Conchita has at least some knowledge of the circumstances.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
I don't know who Conchita is but there is a statement of the link in an email where other statements have also been shown to be accurate.

Would have to assume Conchita has at least some knowledge of the circumstances.

The first actual claim in the email is incorrect. The lottery was not won in NM. The email is right that the two entities share the same name, but I wouldn’t call it anything close to proof.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
The first actual claim in the email is incorrect. The lottery was not won in NM. The email is right that the two entities share the same name, but I wouldn’t call it anything close to proof.
That's true. I got confused on the state in which the lottery was won.

JE Zorro is NM
Lottery Zorro is OK.
 
I don't know who Conchita is but there is a statement of the link in an email where other statements have also been shown to be accurate.

Would have to assume Conchita has at least some knowledge of the circumstances.
That was a hilarious point for me on this whole redaction fiasco. They felt compelled to redact the name in the email address but missed it in the signature. These people are clearly not the best 😂
 
Well the agent conducting the interview felt it did and passed it all the way up to the Muells
It's more evidence. But it isn't a verification.

Someone will have to see if there is searchable info on the OK Zorro. And see if there is any evidence on that side of the conspiracy.
 
It's more evidence. But it isn't a verification.

Someone will have to see if there is searchable info on the OK Zorro. And see if there is any evidence on that side of the conspiracy.

Not sure I’d even call it more evidence. Rather I think the email is the source of all the other speculation. And the speculation may be factual, but you need detail on the Zorro OK to confirm
 
It's more evidence. But it isn't a verification.

Someone will have to see if there is searchable info on the OK Zorro. And see if there is any evidence on that side of the conspiracy.
Oh I don’t disagree. But I’m getting a huge laugh out if the effort being expended by somebody attacking it for no obvious reason and thus providing support to the pedo Epstein estate. 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smokey123

Advertisement



Back
Top