Smokey123
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2015
- Messages
- 17,817
- Likes
- 41,345
there was a lottery won that was picked up by a Zorro employee.
its redacted so its impossible to really tell but this particular email seems more like its part of an investigation rather than a report on some rando saying there were baby eating black people. There was some level of homework done by whoever sent this email. The baby eating email had very little/no follow up.
not saying its conclusive, but its multiple steps more believable than the spaghetti monster in the sky you want it to be.
Never doubt the spaghetti monster in the sky. It's terrifying.there was a lottery won that was picked up by a Zorro employee.
its redacted so its impossible to really tell but this particular email seems more like its part of an investigation rather than a report on some rando saying there were baby eating black people. There was some level of homework done by whoever sent this email. The baby eating email had very little/no follow up.
not saying its conclusive, but its multiple steps more believable than the spaghetti monster in the sky you want it to be.
Asking questions is never a bad thing. Being a hypocrite and lying are sins though. Yes Iâll continue to bring up your dismissal of Epstein raping children oh and the fact you proudly claimed there was absolutely nothing in the files (even though you said you didnât read a single one)Lmfao youâre mocking me for the sin of wanting more than a random email before believing your lottery conspiracy?
Asking questions is never a bad thing. Being a hypocrite and lying are sins though. Yes Iâll continue to bring up your dismissal of Epstein raping children oh and the fact you proudly claimed there was absolutely nothing in the files (even though you said you didnât read a single one)
My conspiracy? I donât care much about it, I care far more about the feds never stepping foot on Zorro ranch when it was in multiple testimonies. The possible lotto is just a side piece to that.
source for there being a winning lottery for the specified amount? it was in some of the links I am pretty sure you posted clearing up the issue about the "re" drawing of said lottery, now you are questioning that there was even a lottery after establishing it yourself? you are being too much of a contrarian you aren't even keeping up with your own points. pretty sure the same sources, I can't remember if I read it in your links or some others tbh, mentioned a Zorro Trust employee did pick it up.And your source for that is the email or do you have something else?
We need a lot more than an email before coming in with your overly dramatic âso the whole Epstein thing is fabricatedâ. There may be more to this. But we need more than a random email
source for there being a winning lottery for the specified amount? it was in some of the links I am pretty sure you posted clearing up the issue about the "re" drawing of said lottery, now you are questioning that there was even a lottery after establishing it yourself? you are being too much of a contrarian you aren't even keeping up with your own points. pretty sure the same sources, I can't remember if I read it in your links or some others tbh, mentioned a Zorro Trust employee did pick it up.
why do a bunch of randos on the internet "need" more of anything to continue a conversation? as far as I have seen we haven't condemned anyone but Epstein for any of these acts.
you can just point out that the link between the two possible Zorros has not been established, and leave it at that. but you are taking it to a different level than just wanting to get the facts straight.
read back to previous convos in the other Epstein thread. Not going to blow up another thread for pointless back and forthLmao my misrepresentation? Look at what you responded to. ND40 was mocking me for the sin of wanting more than a random email as evidence.
Please show where Iâve lied. Iâll wait?
I disagree. You are at your privilege to doubt their source. But now you have to provide a source to refute. I don't know how you do that but if the Zorros are not connected there should be some evidence especially considering this isn't new news.And your source for that is the email or do you have something else?
We need a lot more than an email before coming in with your overly dramatic âso the whole Epstein thing is fabricatedâ. There may be more to this. But we need more than a random email
I don't know who Conchita is but there is a statement of the link in an email where other statements have also been shown to be accurate.How? The email is someone claiming the two are linked. But it in no way verifies it. Rather it seems to be the source of the claim.
I don't know who Conchita is but there is a statement of the link in an email where other statements have also been shown to be accurate.
Would have to assume Conchita has at least some knowledge of the circumstances.
That was a hilarious point for me on this whole redaction fiasco. They felt compelled to redact the name in the email address but missed it in the signature. These people are clearly not the bestI don't know who Conchita is but there is a statement of the link in an email where other statements have also been shown to be accurate.
Would have to assume Conchita has at least some knowledge of the circumstances.
It's more evidence. But it isn't a verification.
Someone will have to see if there is searchable info on the OK Zorro. And see if there is any evidence on that side of the conspiracy.
Oh I donât disagree. But Iâm getting a huge laugh out if the effort being expended by somebody attacking it for no obvious reason and thus providing support to the pedo Epstein estate.It's more evidence. But it isn't a verification.
Someone will have to see if there is searchable info on the OK Zorro. And see if there is any evidence on that side of the conspiracy.
