End of Season Discussion...Did we meet, not exceed, or exceed expectation?

How do you rank Coach Tyndall's First Year


  • Total voters
    0
#1

MasterShake Vol8

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2015
Messages
221
Likes
170
#1
Well I will start this thread as the VOLS are once again playing pitiful and lying down at home. Barring an SEC Tournament title we will now not be playing in the NIT or NCAA championships. Please keep this to whether you think we met, did not meet, or exceeded expectation. As for me I am really down as to how the season began and was going through the beginning of the SEC schedule. I thought for sure we should have been able to secure a NIT at that point, but going into the season I thought an NIT bid would have drastically exceeded expectations. I will say we met expectation but I am still on the downside of that.
First year Tyndall gets a C-, about as low of a passing grade you can get.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#2
#2
New coach, players hurt/gone, it wasn't great. Maybe next year!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#3
#3
Barely passed. End of year was disappointing. We seemed to have something early in the SEC year but really fell off. 7-11 is higher than I expected (5-13) but not great after what we saw this team could do.
CDT gets a C+
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#5
#5
Tyndall proved his system works, he just needs more bodies so guys aren't playing 35 minutes every night. That's a large reason for the recent decline.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#6
#6
Tyndall proved his system works, he just needs more bodies so guys aren't playing 35 minutes every night. That's a large reason for the recent decline.

Also talent... Talent would help. And a guy above 6'8" also.
 
#11
#11
Barely met, but only because I expected total disaster. Not sold on him long-term, especially because of poor recruiting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#13
#13
No real point guard (JRich has played admirable at that position, but he is not a point guard), no post players, small ball, worst rebounding team ever, the original recruits bailing out, new coach with baggage. It is what it is. Be fortunate we didn't end in last place in the SEC. It's going to take some years before this program is competitive again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#15
#15
We were 12-5 and finished 15-15 so no, this sucks. And the way we lost games down the stretch, and our home record makes it even worse. We won't ever win big time games playing zone with all the holes in it. And the way recruiting is going it isn't going to be better anytime soon. 8 sec teams are ranked top 25 in recruiting and the Vols are nowhere to be seen, not even close. If the ncaa comes down on Tyndall at all or keeps players from wanting to come here, then we need to cut ties. And right now recruiting is struggling bc of the ncaa cloud hanging over Donnie. This is fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#16
#16
Considering this team won big games on the road yet flopped at home I say NOT MET...this bunch could have made the NCAA tourney.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#17
#17
Met, however, they sure got everyone's hopes up starting out 12-5 and basically fell flat on their faces after that. Sad thing is next season will be even worse. Scored 49 points with Josh RichArdson against South Carolina at home! really! Freaking South Carolina!
 
#18
#18
To hear some of you talk we should have Kentucky type expectations every year. When the truth is in the past 30 years UT basketball has been relevant 8 of those years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#19
#19
I said that this season was a toss up at the beginning. Possibly a tournament team to possibly a 15-16 win team. The problem is that the losses of McGhee, Chiles, Woodson, and even McKnight were terrible for a team needing an inside game and with little experience. We had to have everything go our way. We had a couple of stinkers, which is not surprising with our limited offense. But we also played close games and had chances to win another 3-4 games against good teams. Fine line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#20
#20
To hear some of you talk we should have Kentucky type expectations every year. When the truth is in the past 30 years UT basketball has been relevant 8 of those years.

Not necessarily true. Jerry Green won 20+ games every year and went to 4 straight NCAA tourneys. Bruce Pearl took ism t the mountain top and then got screwed by his own Administration.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#21
#21
Not necessarily true. Jerry Green won 20+ games every year and went to 4 straight NCAA tourneys. Bruce Pearl took ism t the mountain top and then got screwed by his own Administration.

I will agree with you that Pearl got axed only because Hamilton was tired of him.
 
#23
#23
Not necessarily true. Jerry Green won 20+ games every year and went to 4 straight NCAA tourneys. Bruce Pearl took ism t the mountain top and then got screwed by his own Administration.

Pearl got screwed by his own character. You shouldn't have to tell a 50 year old man that lying to the governing body of your profession in an investigation is a bad idea. And he'll get Auburn in hot water at some point too, book it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people

VN Store



Back
Top