I have long thought that due to the importance of recruiting, and the predictive ability of talent, that recruiting as a singular skill is far under valued. In other words if simple talent averages alone can explain about 70% of wins and losses, recruiting should maybe be given much more credence. Thinking outside the box, a guy like O, could be brought on a staff and given a title but only focuses on recruiting. This position would have a huge salary but no real coaching responsibility. I'm not suggesting we hire that mumbling fool, but I do think that the system could be tweaked to hyper utilize great recruiters without devaluing a whole staff with limited positions.