Dooley and Muschamp on CFL.

#1
Orange Blazer

Orange Blazer

You serious Clark?
Joined
Feb 16, 2011
Messages
7,406
Likes
255
#1
I'd take Dooley 10 out of 10 times. Muschamp is very unimpressive in all he does. Well except sideline meltdowns. Second to none in that category.
 
#3
#3
Im high on him as a person and a representative. He has this year to prove he can coach. Even ESPN thinks Muschamp is a tool. They would cut his answers and go back to Dooley. It was obvious he didnt have a clue.
 
#13
#13
justingroves said:
He's a mediocre, at best, HC
Click to expand...

How can you say that off one year? UF had under 60 scholarship players if I remember correctly and had to switch from a spread offense to a pro style.

No one has seen Muschamp with a roster full of his players or even any of his players. The type of skill set the offense had did not mix with the defense at all, thats not Muschamp's fault
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#14
#14
Muschamp's complete lack of composure doesn't win him any points.

If you win, no one cares how you act.
If you lose, it really helps to be a nice guy that's good with the press.

Comparing the 2 coaches, neither has won anything but Dooley is a smooth talker and Muschamp couldn't talk his way out of a brown paper bag.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#15
#15
I don't think anyone is commenting on Muschamp's coaching ability (yet), just the well-established fact that he is a complete dbag.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#17
#17
StlCardinals2618 said:
How can you say that off one year? UF had under 60 scholarship players if I remember correctly and had to switch from a spread offense to a pro style.

No one has seen Muschamp with a roster full of his players or even any of his players. The type of skill set the offense had did not mix with the defense at all, thats not Muschamp's fault
Click to expand...

Under 60?? Isn't the limit like 87? Why in the world would he be down that many players?
 
#18
#18
StlCardinals2618 said:
How can you say that off one year? UF had under 60 scholarship players if I remember correctly and had to switch from a spread offense to a pro style.

No one has seen Muschamp with a roster full of his players or even any of his players. The type of skill set the offense had did not mix with the defense at all, thats not Muschamp's fault
Click to expand...
And barley broke a sweat waxing dooleys ass in the swamp last year, hopefully this year will yield different results
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#20
#20
Muschump had been groomed at Texas for years to eventually take over an elite program and then all of the sudden was given the keys to one of the top 3 programs in the country. Year one or not, he should be prepared to be a darn good HC or be prepared to be the next Ron Zook.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#21
#21
Those of you who are judging both coaches at this point are basing it on pure emotion and how you "feel" rather than on fact. Everyone is entitled to his or her opinion, but the jury is still out on both. Both could be epic failures or the head up the next dynasty. How Muschamp acts on the sideline or Dooley's progress of building a roster from an absolute train wreck does not predict or ensure future results. The comments about douche bags, deer in the head lights, perfect hair and yadda yadda sound like a bunch of gossipy ole women at a bridge party. Entertaining, but you can do better than that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11 people
#23
#23
StlCardinals2618 said:
How can you say that off one year? UF had under 60 scholarship players if I remember correctly and had to switch from a spread offense to a pro style.

No one has seen Muschamp with a roster full of his players or even any of his players. The type of skill set the offense had did not mix with the defense at all, thats not Muschamp's fault
Click to expand...

He's Forrest Gump with a temper
 
#24
#24
volroadwarrior said:
Those of you who are judging both coaches at this point are basing it on pure emotion and how you "feel" rather than on fact. Everyone is entitled to his or her opinion, but the jury is still out on both. Both could be epic failures or the head up the next dynasty. How Muschamp acts on the sideline or Dooley's progress of building a roster from an absolute train wreck does not predict or ensure future results. The comments about douche bags, deer in the head lights, perfect hair and yadda yadda sound like a bunch of gossipy ole women at a bridge party. Entertaining, but you can do better than that.
Click to expand...

Good post. I'd still rather have Dooley!
 
#25
#25
volroadwarrior said:
Those of you who are judging both coaches at this point are basing it on pure emotion and how you "feel" rather than on fact. Everyone is entitled to his or her opinion, but the jury is still out on both. Both could be epic failures or the head up the next dynasty. How Muschamp acts on the sideline or Dooley's progress of building a roster from an absolute train wreck does not predict or ensure future results. The comments about douche bags, deer in the head lights, perfect hair and yadda yadda sound like a bunch of gossipy ole women at a bridge party. Entertaining, but you can do better than that.
Click to expand...

Excellent work sir. :salute:
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top