JonGrudensAgent
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2012
- Messages
- 12,596
- Likes
- 13,980
To hell with Schiano and him trying to hold UT hostage. Do NOT pay him ****. He supposedly signed a memorandum. Not a final contract. Parties have the ability to opt out obviously and that's what our fan base forced this incompetent administration to do.
If Schiano wants to try to squeeze blood out of a turnip make him try. Let him sue. If he wants to take it to that low life level. Let him. That'll just further prove we don't want his shyster ass in Knoxville.
Now, go hire a real coach who has had success in the South with recruiting, winning, culture, etc.
Sumlin, Kiffin, Petrino, Mike Leach (the only one not truly having coached in this region, but a FANTASTIC coach who literally fits in anywhere because he's so unique).
Plus a Mike Leach hire would piss off ESPN and I'm literally all in on pissing off ESPN......
I would expect there to be some sort of ethics section in the MOU. If GS failed to disclose the released testimony, then UT may be able to argue that he failed to properly notify them of potentially damaging information. GS no doubt knew of the existence of the released testimony and it is possible, though unlikely, that Currie did not.
Well, theres lots of lawyers, probably should brush up on contract law...
The purpose of an MOA is to have a written understanding of the agreement between parties. The MOA can also be a legal document that is binding and hold the parties responsible to their commitment or just a partnership agreement.Oct 30, 2015
A 'Memorandum of Understanding' is also known as an 'MOU'. MOUs are generally used to document a relationship of goodwill between the parties to the MOU. MOUs are generally not legally binding (however note that a MOU may be legally binding if it satisfies all of the six elements of a Contract).Apr 4, 2012
The requisite elements that must be established to demonstrate the formation of a legally binding contract are (1) offer; (2) acceptance; (3) consideration; (4) mutuality of obligation; (5) competency and capacity; and, in certain circumstances, (6) a written instrument.
Or try reading this from Marquette law...
https://law.marquette.edu/assets/sports-law/pdf/for-the-record/v21i1.pdf
Wait, you dont want Schiano because he might of knew of a person who hurt kids but you DO want a guy want a coach who was fired FOR hurting a kid?
:blink:
This, is what we call hypocritical.
Technically, Schiano hasn't really done anything wrong - to be honest, I don't get this point. Maybe Tennessee should be looking at the people that made the decision instead of a third party.