DOJ recovers missing text messages between anti-Trump FBI agents Strzok and Page

#227
#227
1972 Grad said:
Are those percentages rounded off to the nearest 10%, because I assume you have done an exhaustive study going back many years.? Do you have the percentages from your studies of MSNBC and CNN?
Click to expand...

LOL, would like to see those percentages.
 
#229
#229
1972 Grad said:
Are those percentages rounded off to the nearest 10%, because I assume you have done an exhaustive study going back many years.? Do you have the percentages from your studies of MSNBC and CNN?
Click to expand...

Yes, rounded to nearest 10%. Most of the data is classified, and the little that was not has somehow disappeared. (I suspect Nunes is somehow involved)

CNN and MSNBC:

60% factual data
35% factual data with added comentary
4.8% factual data with slight slant and bias
0.2% inaccuracies which are quickly corrected
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#231
#231
luthervol said:
yes, rounded to nearest 10%. Most of the data is classified, and the little that was not has somehow disappeared. (i suspect nunes is somehow involved)

cnn and msnbc:

60% factual data
35% factual data with added comentary
4.8% factual data with slight slant and bias
0.2% inaccuracies which are quickly corrected
Click to expand...

lol
 

Attachments

  • NeRgUGj.gif
    NeRgUGj.gif
    3.6 MB · Views: 67
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#232
#232
luthervol said:
Yes, rounded to nearest 10%. Most of the data is classified, and the little that was not has somehow disappeared. (I suspect Nunes is somehow involved)

CNN and MSNBC:

60% factual data
35% factual data with added comentary
4.8% factual data with slight slant and bias
0.2% inaccuracies which are quickly corrected
Click to expand...

Are you including lying by omission?

How The Media Buried Two Huge FBI Stories Yesterday
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#236
#236
luthervol said:
Are you talking about the "Nunes Method of Reporting"? Yes, included.
Click to expand...

LOL, you know the Grassley-Graham memo calling for criminal investigations, further solidifies what the Nunes memo laid out. Nunes memo made no conclusions, just presented facts.

Question...do you even know what the underlying foundations of the Grassley-Graham memo calling for criminal investigations stem from?
 
#238
#238
Vol0725 said:
LOL, you know the Grassley-Graham memo calling for criminal investigations, further solidifies what the Nunes memo laid out. Nunes memo made no conclusions, just presented facts.

Question...do you even know what the underlying foundations of the Grassley-Graham memo calling for criminal investigations stem from?
Click to expand...

You aren't reading critically if you actually believe this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#239
#239
luthervol said:
Yes, rounded to nearest 10%. Most of the data is classified, and the little that was not has somehow disappeared. (I suspect Nunes is somehow involved)

CNN and MSNBC:

60% factual data
35% factual data with added comentary
4.8% factual data with slight slant and bias
0.2% inaccuracies which are quickly corrected
Click to expand...

lol

I'm glad you have a good sense of humor this early in the morning.
 
#241
#241
luthervol said:
Yes, rounded to nearest 10%. Most of the data is classified, and the little that was not has somehow disappeared. (I suspect Nunes is somehow involved)

CNN and MSNBC:

60% factual data
35% factual data with added comentary
4.8% factual data with slight slant and bias
0.2% inaccuracies which are quickly corrected
Click to expand...

Lol. Started drinking early, I see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#242
#242
Originally Posted by Vol0725 View Post
LOL, you know the Grassley-Graham memo calling for criminal investigations, further solidifies what the Nunes memo laid out. Nunes memo made no conclusions, just presented facts.

Question...do you even know what the underlying foundations of the Grassley-Graham memo calling for criminal investigations stem from?


ClearwaterVol said:
You aren't reading critically if you actually believe this.
Click to expand...

Spoken like a true Schffilterian.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#243
#243
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#244
#244
ajvol01 said:
FBI Missed Clinton Emails Openly MARKED Classified, Wanted To Conclude Probe Before IG Caught Mistake – True PunditTrue Pundit
Click to expand...

Luther/Mick , what say you?

Debunking CNN's 'Debunking' of the FBI Text on Obama Wanting 'to Know Everything' :: Grabien News

:popcorn:

[twitter]<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Debunking more delusional liberal nonsense. These police-state liberals, and their Pravda pals in the media, will say anything to coverup this exploding scandal. <a href="https://t.co/ggsxlLeRCD">https://t.co/ggsxlLeRCD</a></p>&mdash; Dan Bongino (@dbongino) <a href="https://twitter.com/dbongino/status/961652696427134976?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 8, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>[/twitter]
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#245
#245
Vol0725 said:
Luther/Mick , what say you?

Debunking CNN's 'Debunking' of the FBI Text on Obama Wanting 'to Know Everything' :: Grabien News

:popcorn:

[twitter]<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Debunking more delusional liberal nonsense. These police-state liberals, and their Pravda pals in the media, will say anything to coverup this exploding scandal. <a href="https://t.co/ggsxlLeRCD">https://t.co/ggsxlLeRCD</a></p>&mdash; Dan Bongino (@dbongino) <a href="https://twitter.com/dbongino/status/961652696427134976?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 8, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>[/twitter]
Click to expand...

I would ask if they were included in the total number they disclosed in their final findings? Do you know if they were or is this another "lock her up" moment?

“Remind me to tell you to flag for Andy [redacted] emails we (actually ICIG) found that have portion marks (C) on a couple of paras. DoJ was Very Concerned about this,” he wrote.

“Found on the 30k [emails] provided to State originally. No one noticed. It cuts against ‘I never sent or received anything marked classified,’”

It really cuts against your claim they were bias. Sounds like he discovered it and reported it.
 
Last edited:
#246
#246
#247
#247
Mick said:
I would ask if they were included in the total number they disclosed in their final findings? Do you know if they were or is this another "lock her up" moment?

“Remind me to tell you to flag for Andy [redacted] emails we (actually ICIG) found that have portion marks (C) on a couple of paras. DoJ was Very Concerned about this,” he wrote.

“Found on the 30k [emails] provided to State originally. No one noticed. It cuts against ‘I never sent or received anything marked classified,’”

It really cuts against your claim they were bias. Sounds like he discovered it and reported it.
Click to expand...

Dunno, think there were redactions in between as well, just draws questions...sure IG Horowitz investigation report will spell out the truth in findings.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top