Fine Vol
Go Vols
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2006
- Messages
- 19,849
- Likes
- 2
I agree that it's a good thing the serial rapist got caught and all, but the law is the law. You break it, you get thrown in jail. And it's not comparable to a case like the boy in Georgia who got head from some girl and he got put in jail; it's not an old archaic law, it's bounty hunting.I know he broke the law, but if breaking the law means getting a serial rapist, then that's fine w/ me. who cares bout mexico, they need to learn how to keep their own ppl in their country
there's a right way and a wrong way to get justice. Some vigilante thug going into a foreign country where bounty hunting is illegal and kidnapping someone, which is exactly what he did since he had no legal authority to take the guy into custody, is the wrong way. Dog is NOT a police officer, he is a private vigilante who is hired by the bail bond company. That's all. He didn't go after Luster because he was a rapist, he went after him because he jumped bail and the bail bondsman was about to lose that money.What if that man he caught had messed with Danica Patrick huh huh then you would like dog!!!!!
there's a right way and a wrong way to get justice. Some vigilante thug going into a foreign country where bounty hunting is illegal and kidnapping someone, which is exactly what he did since he had no legal authority to take the guy into custody, is the wrong way. Dog is NOT a police officer, he is a private vigilante who is hired by the bail bond company. That's all. He didn't go after Luster because he was a rapist, he went after him because he jumped bail and the bail bondsman was about to lose that money.
He got caught breaking the law and he was arrested. He made bail and then he fled. Nobody else seems to see the irony in the fact that the world's most famous bounty hunter jumped bail the first chance he got. What a coward.
well put I agree 100 percentThe irony is out gov't reaction. Big thumbs down to the US government on this one for being both spineless and hypocritical.
Federal agents were more than happy to take Luster off Dog's hands, knowing full well where and how Dog picked him up. You didn't see the government turning away Dog, lecturing him on international borders, and releasing Luster back to Mexico.
Nope, our government takes Luster, pays Dog, and when the Mexicans throw a fit, caves in like a coal mine. If Luster was apprehended illegally then why is he still in a US prison? Obviously we pick and choose which laws are followed.
Of course they were. It didn't matter how Dog had picked him up, he is a vigilante. But he broke the law in the process and now he has to answer for his crime.Federal agents were more than happy to take Luster off Dog's hands, knowing full well where and how Dog picked him up. You didn't see the government turning away Dog, lecturing him on international borders, and releasing Luster back to Mexico.
Dog is paid by the bail bond company, not the governmentNope, our government takes Luster, pays Dog,
When Mexico asked for a wanted fugitive to be returned, the government complied. Would you rather have the U.S. in the business of harboring fugitives?and when the Mexicans throw a fit, caves in like a coal mine.
Because he is a criminal.If Luster was apprehended illegally then why is he still in a US prison?
I don't see how you get that. Luster will have to answer for his crimes, and Dog will have to answer for his. Show me how that's picking and choosing.Obviously we pick and choose which laws are followed
