drewtigeralum
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2011
- Messages
- 1,348
- Likes
- 76
Richardson was ranked 124th in the nation. So he's a high major recruit imo. He was recruiting by Georgia Tech, Penn State and Oklahoma.
The problem with mid-major level recruits isn't that they have no potential, it's that they aren't likely to impact a program strongly until year 3 or 4. That's why mid-majors tend to have 1 or if lucky, 2 good years every 4 years. Much like the Mercer team we just played who has 5 senior starters.
The problem gets worse as a high major because you're playing against teams who are getting 4/5 star top 100 type players and playing OOC games against teams with similar players. It becomes an issue just making the tournament when you're out talented 2-3 out of every 4 years.
The issue with CCM is that he has taken players that look like they'd be a reach even for a good mid-major team. The players you reach on at this level are those guys ranked in the 150 range. Essentially the team were winning with is a core group of guys ranked in the top 75 in high school and Josh, who was as I said, 124th.
I know rankings aren't the be all, end all, but if you look at the top 20 in basketball recruiting most years, they're your teams who make NCAA's most every year and tend to advance more often than not. It's always got names like Kentucky, Florida, Michigan State, Arizona, North Carolina, Duke, UConn etc. I know his name is mud here to many of you, but it's not a coincidence that Pearl signed top 25 classes after his first year for the most part and for the most part we were a consistent top 25/NCAA team that had a few good runs in the tourney.
The way to avoid the let down while not recruiting top 100 kids is to constantly have a flow of players entering their 3 or 4th year. Also, Martin has signed more 5* players in the last 3 years than Purdue (just using them as an example) has signed in past 10. You need the 4 and 5* talent, but you can surround them with 3* players you have developed and still win. For better or worse, this was the strategy that Gene Keady made it to the hall of fame with. Basically, his best teams had one inside scorer, one outside scorer, a solid defending wing, a solid pass first point guard, and a rebounding big. He leaned on his scores to score, and the other 3 players to defend the other team enough to keep their best players from scoring. Right now, U.T. has 3 scores going off, and that paired with great defense is always a formula for success. That is the model the Martin has coached in. Some people like it, some people don't, that's sort of the way of the world.