TenUhSee
Vol For Life
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2017
- Messages
- 2,349
- Likes
- 4,584
Why interview Freeze or Briles if they don’t fit your offensive philosophy? Makes zero sense. If they don’t fit why even entertain 2 guys that have a suspect background? My thinking is he’s an idiot. He tried to hire these guy hoping they’d conform to him and get them super cheap bc of there shady past. It’s one thing to strike out on one, but to strike out on 2? It’s they either said FU I’m not coming to work for you and have to change my style and for very little money, or Someone like Phil is preventing it. Both Pruit and Phil are literally learning on the job. Which shouldn’t be happening here at TN.
Pruitt should have never hired his buddy Will Friend. Going into business with friends is stupid. The OL got no better as the season progressed. Loyalty will get Pruitt fired and even worse will screw the program.
Stats show the OL improved YoY, DESPITE losing 3 veteran OL, then Kennedy, then Trey.
And what about research? Friend is well respected as a great OL coach.
Probably because the back end of the schedule was much easier than the front end. We couldn't block a soul all year. We couldn't even block Charlotte.
Or maybe he is interviewing all the options to be able to find the right fit and to be able to make an informed decision. I know. It’s a crazy thought.Why interview Freeze or Briles if they don’t fit your offensive philosophy? Makes zero sense. If they don’t fit why even entertain 2 guys that have a suspect background? My thinking is he’s an idiot. He tried to hire these guy hoping they’d conform to him and get them super cheap bc of there shady past. It’s one thing to strike out on one, but to strike out on 2? It’s they either said FU I’m not coming to work for you and have to change my style and for very little money, or Someone like Phil is preventing it. Both Pruit and Phil are literally learning on the job. Which shouldn’t be happening here at TN.
Why interview Freeze or Briles if they don’t fit your offensive philosophy? Makes zero sense. If they don’t fit why even entertain 2 guys that have a suspect background? My thinking is he’s an idiot. He tried to hire these guy hoping they’d conform to him and get them super cheap bc of there shady past. It’s one thing to strike out on one, but to strike out on 2? It’s they either said FU I’m not coming to work for you and have to change my style and for very little money, or Someone like Phil is preventing it. Both Pruit and Phil are literally learning on the job. Which shouldn’t be happening here at TN.
Why interview Freeze or Briles if they don’t fit your offensive philosophy? Makes zero sense. If they don’t fit why even entertain 2 guys that have a suspect background? My thinking is he’s an idiot. He tried to hire these guy hoping they’d conform to him and get them super cheap bc of there shady past. It’s one thing to strike out on one, but to strike out on 2? It’s they either said FU I’m not coming to work for you and have to change my style and for very little money, or Someone like Phil is preventing it. Both Pruit and Phil are literally learning on the job. Which shouldn’t be happening here at TN.
Why interview Freeze or Briles if they don’t fit your offensive philosophy? Makes zero sense. If they don’t fit why even entertain 2 guys that have a suspect background? My thinking is he’s an idiot. He tried to hire these guy hoping they’d conform to him and get them super cheap bc of there shady past. It’s one thing to strike out on one, but to strike out on 2? It’s they either said FU I’m not coming to work for you and have to change my style and for very little money, or Someone like Phil is preventing it. Both Pruit and Phil are literally learning on the job. Which shouldn’t be happening here at TN.
Why interview Freeze or Briles if they don’t fit your offensive philosophy? Makes zero sense. If they don’t fit why even entertain 2 guys that have a suspect background? My thinking is he’s an idiot. He tried to hire these guy hoping they’d conform to him and get them super cheap bc of there shady past. It’s one thing to strike out on one, but to strike out on 2? It’s they either said FU I’m not coming to work for you and have to change my style and for very little money, or Someone like Phil is preventing it. Both Pruit and Phil are literally learning on the job. Which shouldn’t be happening here at TN.
lolwut? Who are these OCs that throw 75% of the time?!? Definitely not Briles or Yurcich.
Someone alert "pro style spread" OCs they are offending god's definitions of football styles.
Fwiw, spread is ubiquitous these days, pro and otherwise. You can be both spread and use pro concepts and make use of TEs. It's not unusual at all. If you are arguing "pro style" in the classic sense, nearly no one runs it exclusively anymore, maybe a dinosaur here or there.
Lastly, when did Pruitt set such strict parameters for his offense? I only ever heard him saying he wanted a strong run game. Briles has just that.
No.... you just don’t get it. A Briles, or Freeze, or Kiffen Offense’s could still mesh with Pruitts philosophy in a brilliant way.