I find it very satisfying that USC is ranked outside of the top 10 now per Rivals. All that X has done is lose a commitment, maybe didn't fit their system, while Dooley is rolling in some good players and we are now ranked 7th on Rivals.
Alright, I knew this was coming so I will defend myself once and that is it since I HAVE let it go. I was thrilled to hear X was gone. If he would've stayed, we would've been on probation in a couple of years. I am all about Dooley. Underrated coach, phenominal recruiter, class act, and he is from the south. I just think it is great that so many made a big deal about X's efforts last year, and Dooley has done the same thingin just under 3 weeks. Now we are ahead (for the time being) of the "mighty mighty" Trojans. I guess guys really do want to wear our yellow jerseys.
I think I could care less what or how they are doing and that people need to get over their Kiffin Complex.
I don't understand why people act we we should just forget about Kiffin. Any anger at Kiffin is entirely justified. He split for Cali less than a month before signing day and left our football program in the toilet for the forseeable future.
Does it really matter cause Kiffin wins either way. If UT's class finishes in the top 8 Kiffin and co will say it's because of the ground work they laid. If we finish lower, then Kiffin says it's because we are missing him and his staff's recruiting. So frankly I could give a flying fart where USC finishes. As long as we have addressed our needs then it's all good as far as I'm concerned.
To be perfectly honest with you, I'm only concerned about how we finish. They're gone, so let's let them be gone. CDD and co. seem to be doing a fine job.
I don't understand why people act we we should just forget about Kiffin. Any anger at Kiffin is entirely justified. He split for Cali less than a month before signing day and left our football program in the toilet for the forseeable future.
He left for what he felt was a better job in a more desireable location. People from all walks of life do it everyday. Get over it.
If Kiffin, after 14 months, was able to leave "our football program in the toilet for the forseeable future" then UT didn't have much of a football program to begin with.
Stop acting like scorned lover hilljacks.
And that was pretty much the case. Fulmer had run our once dominant program off the road and into a ditch. Kiffin, EO and co. were handed the keys, and promptly pulled the car out of the ditch, back onto the road, and proceded to drive it off a cliff. At that time of year there was no chance of hiring a comparable replacement, and now we're in even worse shape than we were when Fulmer was still coaching. Don't get me wrong, Fulmer HAD to go, it just sucks to have Kiffin do what he did after we gave him a shot to resurrect his career after the Oakland debacle.
It is debatable whether UT is currently in worse shape thanit was during Fulmer's final years. If so, UT appears to be heading upwards and not continuing the delusional spiral further downwards from 2003-2008.
How do we appear to be heading upwards? Our original hire after Fulmer bolted for greener pastures after one season, and then we hired a guy whose only coaching esxperience is 3 years of losing in the WAC.
Last year's player development, what appears to be 2 good recruiting classes, renewed enthusiasm, being competitive and not getting destroyed 100-37 and 59-15 by our 2 biggest rivals, etc. It is a process and I think 2010 will a 5-7 year but you have to look at the bigger picture and the trend appears upward.
But 95% of all those things can be attributed to CLK. It is a major positve that we were able to retain Chaney and LT IMO, but I continue to be underwhelmed by Dooley. We'll see how things pan out on Wednesday, if we get Rogers and Ambles that will be huge, but for the most part Dooley has just closed on many of Kiffin's recruits, and signed a few mediocre ones of his own.