WaywardVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2022
- Messages
- 1,232
- Likes
- 1,478
1. The team that makes the fewest mistakes wins.
Watching Indiana dismantle Oregon and Bama, the 5th and 2nd best rated rosters in college football, had me scratching my head. Cignetti is doing more than he’s getting credit for. You’re impressed? Not as much as you should be. He is putting the college coaching world on notice. You can’t help but compare, so one has to ask, does Heupel have what it takes to achieve what Cignetti has accomplished? Both face uphill battles. Indiana is a perennial door mat. I mean, zero history of success. UT was in a spiral when Heupel arrived. In year one, Cignetti had the Hoosiers in the playoff his first year. In year two, they are undefeated and playing for it all. He’s beat some of the best historic programs in doing so. They aren’t just winning, they are handling folks.
The first maxim is telling. Indiana is in the top 5 in the nation for fewest penalties committed. Do they false start, jump off sides, or get hit with personal fouls? Nope. Do they give up turnovers? It is nothing short of remarkable. One lost fumble all year. One!!!
How is Tennessee in penalties? 75th. Which Sadly is an improvement. Heupel’s teams have consistently ranked in the bottom of college football since he became a head coach. I’m talking in the hundreds. We’ve grown accustomed to laundry on the field. One cannot fulfill the maxims if it cannot fulfill the first. This is why I don’t see Heupel making it here. Every Saturday, he takes a steaming hot **** on the General’s legacy. He shrugs and says We have to do better? Really?
if you had to base your decision on the maxims alone, would the General hire Heupel to work for him?
Watching Indiana dismantle Oregon and Bama, the 5th and 2nd best rated rosters in college football, had me scratching my head. Cignetti is doing more than he’s getting credit for. You’re impressed? Not as much as you should be. He is putting the college coaching world on notice. You can’t help but compare, so one has to ask, does Heupel have what it takes to achieve what Cignetti has accomplished? Both face uphill battles. Indiana is a perennial door mat. I mean, zero history of success. UT was in a spiral when Heupel arrived. In year one, Cignetti had the Hoosiers in the playoff his first year. In year two, they are undefeated and playing for it all. He’s beat some of the best historic programs in doing so. They aren’t just winning, they are handling folks.
The first maxim is telling. Indiana is in the top 5 in the nation for fewest penalties committed. Do they false start, jump off sides, or get hit with personal fouls? Nope. Do they give up turnovers? It is nothing short of remarkable. One lost fumble all year. One!!!
How is Tennessee in penalties? 75th. Which Sadly is an improvement. Heupel’s teams have consistently ranked in the bottom of college football since he became a head coach. I’m talking in the hundreds. We’ve grown accustomed to laundry on the field. One cannot fulfill the maxims if it cannot fulfill the first. This is why I don’t see Heupel making it here. Every Saturday, he takes a steaming hot **** on the General’s legacy. He shrugs and says We have to do better? Really?
if you had to base your decision on the maxims alone, would the General hire Heupel to work for him?
