Do pro-choice people say?

#76
#76
Sick at home thinking as in that of hearing the bad news that's gonna be coming out regarding those "phony scandals" that Obama has labeled as such huh? On going investigations non-stop with this corrupt Administration that Obama has assembled. He's wanting to govern like a dictator & go around all the laws that are in place for this nation to work right. If he doesn't like a law, he thinks he can just change it to suit his agenda which he just can't do. What a pos he is.

No just a respiratory infection.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#83
#83
Not today. I'll work on it.

I spent a lot of time at the First Baptist Church in Bolivar, ever go to that po-dunk town? Born at Jackson Memorial.

Small world. I was born at Jackson Memorial. Parents were married at that bigass chapel right across from it.

I also have a clinically insane uncle in Bolivar.
 
#84
#84
It is her body. It's also my house, and my rules until she's living on her own or over 18, a legal adult. There are, of course, certain situations where we would look at those options. I can't speak to that right now because I'm not in that situation.

I do like how you left out the fact that I followed that up with If she was over 18 then it's choice regardless of how I felt.

.
 
Last edited:
#87
#87
What if she's 18....but still living under your roof?

I would want her to have the baby. But since she is 18, then it's her choice. However, with that choice comes a consequence. If she wants to abort she can. Not going to stop her. But I would want her to find a place of her own before then.

Again the circumstances of which the pregnancy happened could change that.
 
#88
#88
I would want her to have the baby. But since she is 18, then it's her choice. However, with that choice comes a consequence. If she wants to abort she can. Not going to stop her. But I would want her to find a place of her own before then.

Again the circumstances of which the pregnancy happened could change that.

Like if the daddy was volmav.. *shudder*
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#89
#89
Why is it the left it ok with killing children but against killing violent criminals?

Why is the right against killing babies but for killing violent criminals? You can't scream "NO BIG GOVERNMENT" and then want the government to interject into personal choice. Same way with gay marriage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#95
#95
Why is the right against killing babies but for killing violent criminals? You can't scream "NO BIG GOVERNMENT" and then want the government to interject into personal choice. Same way with gay marriage.

Not sure if serious.....

Why are you calling a nonviable fetus "children"?

Why are you robbing a living being of its chance at life and denying it's existence as a living being simply because it's still developing? Denying the life of an unborn baby is probably one of the most heinous things out there to me. That child could be the one to cure AIDS...but he could be the antichrist. But we will never know because he was brutally murdered by his mother all in the name if "choice." You can call it what you want, and I'm all about freedom but I cannot fathom how people disassociate the unborn child from being alive.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#96
#96
Much as Mav aggravates the crap out of me, I find his points to be rather illuminating here.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#97
#97
Small world. I was born at Jackson Memorial. Parents were married at that bigass chapel right across from it.

I also have a clinically insane uncle in Bolivar.

it is a small world, my grandfather was a M.D. at Western State in the 50's and 60's.

That's back when they had criminally insane people there.
 
#98
#98
Why is the right against killing babies but for killing violent criminals? You can't scream "NO BIG GOVERNMENT" and then want the government to interject into personal choice. Same way with gay marriage.

I'm pretty dang far right and I'm against the death penalty and abortion. Don't give a flip one way or the other over gay marriage, should be a state decision.
 
#99
#99
Why are you robbing a living being of its chance at life and denying it's existence as a living being simply because it's still developing? Denying the life of an unborn baby is probably one of the most heinous things out there to me. That child could be the one to cure AIDS...but he could be the antichrist. But we will never know because he was brutally murdered by his mother all in the name if "choice." You can call it what you want, and I'm all about freedom but I cannot fathom how people disassociate the unborn child from being alive.

that child could also live a very short life in extreme pain caused by major genetic issues. Every situation is not the same which is why a one-size-fits-all law doesn't work. Parents should be allowed to make decisions which are in the best interest of their child
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
that child could also live a very short life in extreme pain caused by major genetic issues. Every situation is not the same which is why a one-size-fits-all law doesn't work. Parents should be allowed to make decisions which are in the best interest of their child

I can understand the bolded, key is PARENTS (plural) and best interest of the child. I don't think a woman individually deciding to kill an unborn baby fits either criteria.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top