DG's Takeaways from the Arkansas Debacle

#1

DiderotsGhost

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
4,627
Likes
23,503
#1
Another ugly game. I have forced myself to do a write-up and here it is.


Big Picture

Maybe JG is not the biggest problem. Watching Kentucky, I was convinced that JG was the biggest problem. After all, he had 3 extremely egregious turnovers. Watching us play against Alabama and Arkansas, however, I have to think that while JG may be flawed, the bigger problem is higher up.

Pruitt is turning into Muschamp. I really really really hate to say this, but I'm starting to worry Pruitt is just a repackaged Muschamp. Defense didn't play perfect last night, but outside of that 3rd Quarter onslaught, they played well. Offense did absolutely nothing. Again. And it's like we're not even trying.

Ultra-conservative. Look at the teams competing for national titles and none of them are running ultra-conservative offenses. Pruitt wants to run the ball every down. You have to be able to pass the ball and make big plays to win in the modern game. That's how we had success last season; throwing to Jennings, Callaway, and Palmer. We've totally moved away from that and we're running at nearly a 4-to-1 ratio. You can't win games like that! There is no innovation. There is no surprise. Opposing defenses know exactly what we're going to do.

Announcer was flat-out wrong. Announcer saying "Tennessee moved away from what they were good at." No we didn't. It's like he wasn't even watching the same game. We did exactly what we were good at (run the ball). We just did it so many times it became predictable and Arkansas' defense made 2nd half adjustments to stop it. Not that difficult for defenses to adjust when you can only do 1 thing well.

Passing game. Unless Pruitt opens up the passing game soon, he's done for. This is absolutely ridiculous. When Maurer took over in the 3rd after JG's injury, we'd only thrown 8 passes, versus something like 32 runs. That's not balance. That's not unpredictable. That's a recipe to finish at the bottom of the SEC. You have to be able to pass the ball and get big plays in the passing game, like we did last year. It feels like Pruitt is playing scared right now. JG had one disaster game against Kentucky and Pruitt responded by coaching ultra-conservative.


Offense

Maurer. Struggled, but also difficult to evaluate, because we didn't throw him in until things looked ugly. And then we kept running the ball when the defense knew we were going to run it. He also had a rough week to begin with. I wouldn't read too much into his performance.

Bailey. Played reasonably well given the circumstances. Yeah, 2 INTs, but at that point, we had to pass and the defense knew we had to pass. Once again highlighting the fact that our gameplans make it so the defense knows what we're going to do at all times. We're going to run almost literally every down till we're behind. Then when we fall behind a bunch with a conservative game plan, we'll be forced to pass in bad circumstances.

Start Bailey. Even though I now believe JG isn't the biggest problem, I still think I'd start Bailey next week. Feels like he's the best QB on the roster, but small sample size and less-than-ideal circumstances make it difficult to ascertain.

Eric Gray. He's playing so well and it sucks to watch his performances wasted by inept offensive coaching. He's a great player, but you can't put 100% of the offensive burden on him. Feels a bit like 2017 when John Kelly struggled because he was literally the only weapon on our offense. Except, Gray is not the only weapon on our offense; we have plenty of weapons we aren't using. That's what's so frustrating.

Not a fan of No-RB set. Perhaps the only innovation we used last night was the no-RB set, but I hated that look. Why? If the strength of your team is the run game and you have an RB that is also an excellent WR (Eric Gray), then why use a formation with no RB? You can use Eric Gray as a receiver. I don't know what's going on with the offensive coaches, but nothing they are doing makes that much sense to me lately. The gameplans are strategically confused. It feels like 5 different coaches are all arguing about what to do and they come up with some terrible worst-of-all-worlds compromise each week.


Defense

Playing well most of the time. In spite of the gloom and doom here (and I'll admit I'm in that gloom-and-doom camp at the moment), the defense is playing extremely well for long stretches of the game. Almost all of the issues came in the 3rd Quarter. The offense deserves some blame on that, with nothing but 3-and-outs putting even more pressure on the defense. But still, we needed to make some better defensive adjustments sooner.

Slants. If I were an opposing coach, I think I'd just throw the slant 80 times in a row against us. I've yet to see any evidence that our defense can stop it. It seems like every opposing coach realizes we can't defend it well.

To'o To'o. Played very well. Sucks to see great performances on D get squandered.


End Thoughts

We lost 2 games with superior talent. While it sucks to lose to Georgia and Alabama, at least we know both teams are loaded with 5-star talent. Losing to 2 teams that we were clearly more talented than (Kentucky and Arkansas) simply due to poor coaching and execution sucks.

Big Picture. D didn't play perfectly, but you can't win games in the modern game when you only score 13 points. And running the ball 80% of the time is a recipe for only scoring 13 points.

Hate to say it, but this is the most depressed about Vol football I've been since 2017.

GBO!
 
Last edited:
#2
#2
Good writeup.

I love me some Eric Gray, but he's not big enough or bruising enough to ride herd on for an entire game. He's best used in change-of-pace mode to cross up the defense as a component of a balanced attack. Arky got his measure after a while because we never adjusted to their stacking the box. Gray can only do so much.....the QB, at some point, has to make some plays.
 
#3
#3
I will give my opinion on where (big picture) Pruitt is making his big mistake.

When Spurrier had players who were not "getting it", he did not change his system or who he was because the player had an issue. So, he didn't "dumb down" his offense. He didn't run the ball on 3rd and 7 and punt. You throw the ball on 3rd and 7 and he wasn't going to do different because someone was struggling.

Pruitt and the staff have decided to dumb down the offense and it's not helping anyone. Qb's aren't getting any better. The offense isn't any better. You aren't winning. etc.

So, everything you are doing to "give you the best chance to win" is hindering the growth and development of the players who need it and you still aren't winning.

You run your offense. And if it doesn't work, at least you ran your offense and the players may be better next year for it.

Hiding in a shell and being a team that you don't want to be in the first place is stupid. If this is the offense he wants, fine. But, it isn't.
 
#4
#4
I'm definitely not a football genious but I don’t think it takes one to figure this one out...

Too many times in the first half when we were running at will, we neglected opportunities to throw on downs that weren't obvious run or passing downs. By not mixing it up just a little in the first half, we missed the chance to keep the defense guessing. They adjusted to our one dimensional approach and by the time we tried to counter, it was too late...

BAD game plan, play calling, coaching, etc., etc..... Take your choice or all of the above.
 
#5
#5
Pruitt is happy to have a game manager at QB. That would work if we had a dominant offense. Make throws when needed to, and mistake free ball. And a dominant defense. We have neither. He's counting on JG to get everyone lined up and hand the ball off. We've had three blowout losses, and he refused to give any snaps to Maurer or Bailey. JG gets hurt last night, and the game was over. Hell, the game was over when Arkansas scored 21 points.
 
#6
#6
“Defense wins champion....”. Err... not anymore. It’s very noticeable that defense doesn’t win championships anymore. You have to put points on the board to win. Even Saban has admitted that in the past few years, the best teams have been those with a high powered offense. Pruitt needs to either let his offensive coaches coach or get offensive coaches that can coach.
 
#7
#7
Good write up DG.

The salty truth is that Pruitt has done very little to inspire hope for the future. His only decent wins were at #25 Auburn in 2018, and against #11 Kentucky at home also in 2018. Since then he has losses to Georgia St, BYU ( both at home), blown out by Kentucky at home in year 3, losses to Vandy, Mizzou, and getting blow out by UGA, Bama, and UF all 3 years. At this point, he Is making Butch look like Vince Lombardi. The offense is embarrassingly bad, especially with the hype the Oline came in with and 4* talent at WR and RB. He doesn’t know what he’s doing and maybe the worst part is, the team doesn’t play hard for him. That’s the main difference between Pruitt and Pittman. Pittman’s players would run through a brick wall for him. Pruitt? Not so much
 
#9
#9
Pruitt created major locker room problems when he was at Georgia a few years ago under Mark Richt. Those problems were one of the reasons Mark Richt was forced to exit. Also worth noting that Kirby Smart (wisely IMO) chose not to retain Pruitt.

I'd compare Pruitt to Lane Kiffin. Pruitt is an excellent DC with a great track record on the defensive side when he can be reigned in by a strong, mature coach. As a head coach, however, his personality flaws would become a much bigger issue. Part of Mark Richt's failure his last two seasons at UGA was his inability to reign in Pruitt.

People underestimate how much of Saban's brilliance is simply being able to manage difficult personalities.

DG's thoughts from 3 years ago. You 1000% nailed it. The warning signs were there....
 
#11
#11
Pruitt is not a risk taker by any means. He is old school defensive minded would be very happy sitting on a 13 point lead and conservative play calling , no passing too risky, just protect that monster 13 pt lead.

He has no interest in trying to put up 40 or 50 points, he is more than happy trying to squeeze by a get a win. You just can't play that conservative in the SEC, just look at the point that teams average and figure they will put up more than their average against our defense. Arkansas has scored around 30 average this year, High of 37 and low of 21. Pruitt should have known that 13 points was not going to get it done and open up the play calling.

I don't think it is Chaney, we all saw what he did with Bray at QB, the guy was an absolute gun slinger no fear, and we could put up 40 plus no sweat. We have some big arms, JT can throw the deep ball, Pruitt decided to leave him in Knoxville for this game. JG, Maurer and Bailey can all throw the deep ball and yet here we sit 3 runs and punt.
 
Last edited:
#13
#13
Here is a takeaway, we are horrible up the middle and that is a recipe for disaster in any team sport.

Brando Kennedy gets blown up so many times a game. Our QB situation is horrendous. That is the middle of the offense. You cant be that bad in the middle, recipe for disaster.
 
#14
#14
Dear lord, hope I'm wrong about that. I was not a fan of hiring Pruitt at the time, but have bought in since then. But now, I am concerned that my original analysis was correct.

You arent wrong. It's a vicious cycle. We were going to transform from a soft finesse team to an old fashioned physical team. In the SEC, you need to show improvement by Y3 or the seat gets hot. You add to that a guy who would be learning on the job and with a reputation that hes very difficult to get along with, which really narrows the assistant pool. If you dont have it figured out by Y2 or Y3, it gets used against you in recruiting. This was the likely outcome all along.
 
#15
#15
I posted in another thread, I think the defense "doing well" had way more to do with Briles' playcalling than our defense. He definitely constantly kept going away from what was working. His playcalling when they first had it 1st and Goal from the 2 was just non-sensical. Run it 2 times and it's a TD, yet he tried play action all 3 times. And he kept doing RPO with Franks, who's running ability isn't really all that great. He's good for some scrambling and when the defense is completly fooled, but he's too slow to be a real running threat. He looked like he was running in mud a few times.

The 3rd quarter, which happened to be when Briles mostly stopped trying to be cute, they couldn't be stopped.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 05_never_again
#17
#17
I will give my opinion on where (big picture) Pruitt is making his big mistake.

When Spurrier had players who were not "getting it", he did not change his system or who he was because the player had an issue. So, he didn't "dumb down" his offense. He didn't run the ball on 3rd and 7 and punt. You throw the ball on 3rd and 7 and he wasn't going to do different because someone was struggling.

Pruitt and the staff have decided to dumb down the offense and it's not helping anyone. Qb's aren't getting any better. The offense isn't any better. You aren't winning. etc.

So, everything you are doing to "give you the best chance to win" is hindering the growth and development of the players who need it and you still aren't winning.

You run your offense. And if it doesn't work, at least you ran your offense and the players may be better next year for it.

Hiding in a shell and being a team that you don't want to be in the first place is stupid. If this is the offense he wants, fine. But, it isn't.
When you dumb down you lose your edge. That being said, Pruitt isn’t very sharp......
 
#18
#18
I will give my opinion on where (big picture) Pruitt is making his big mistake.

When Spurrier had players who were not "getting it", he did not change his system or who he was because the player had an issue. So, he didn't "dumb down" his offense. He didn't run the ball on 3rd and 7 and punt. You throw the ball on 3rd and 7 and he wasn't going to do different because someone was struggling.

Pruitt and the staff have decided to dumb down the offense and it's not helping anyone. Qb's aren't getting any better. The offense isn't any better. You aren't winning. etc.

So, everything you are doing to "give you the best chance to win" is hindering the growth and development of the players who need it and you still aren't winning.

You run your offense. And if it doesn't work, at least you ran your offense and the players may be better next year for it.

Hiding in a shell and being a team that you don't want to be in the first place is stupid. If this is the offense he wants, fine. But, it isn't.
Mann you are so right... I remember earlier in Pruitt’s tenure he talked about wanting to create explosive plays in the passing game, now that seems like a distant memory
 
#19
#19
Someone will get Freeze but it probably won’t be us. Besides, Fulmer is partial to up and coming assistants and giving them their chance because that’s what he was when he took over in 92. Remember, the UT job came down to Pruitt and Steele
 
#20
#20
To me it's not difficult to evaluate Maurer. Kid runs backwards like it's High School football. Lol
 
#24
#24
This program has 3 problems.

1. There’s multiple coaches on this staff who can’t coach the position they’re assigned. (Neidemeyer, Weinke, Friend, and no DL coach).

2. Pruitt has zero clue what the hell is going on when it comes to offense. So, he needs to shut up and let Chaney run the whole show. It probably won’t make a difference, but Chaney has proven he can coach offense through the years. So, I need Pruitt to step off before I go full out on Chaney.

3. This team isn’t nearly as talented people think they are, do research on Dooley and Jone’s year 3 team. The talent difference is eye raising.
 
#25
#25
I think between time of possession in the first half in favor of UT... Briles making some bad calls in the first half....and Franks being a marginally better version of Guarantano.... the defense looked better than they actually are last night.
 

VN Store



Back
Top